Skip to content

Prevalence and patterns of use of mantra, mindfulness and spiritual meditation among adults in the United States.

Adam Burke, Chun Nok Lam, Barbara Stussman, Hui Yang

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine June 15, 2017 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-017-1827-8 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Secondary analysis of a national cross-sectional survey Peer reviewed
Sample size 34,525
Population US adults responding to the 2012 National Health Interview Survey
Interventions Spiritual meditation Mindfulness meditation Mantra meditation
Duration Lifetime and 12-month use
Topics Meditation
Keywords Humans Spirituality Middle aged United states Female Young adult Health promotion Complementary therapies Integrative medicine Mind body therapies
Key findings Twelve-month meditation use was 3.1% for spiritual, 1.9% for mindfulness, and 1.6% for mantra meditation. Users of the three styles shared many characteristics, suggesting interest in meditation may relate more to the type of person meditating than to the practice selected; higher conventional healthcare utilization was among the strongest predictors of use. Spiritual meditation was more prevalent among former drinkers, which the authors suggest may reflect use in support of alcohol treatment and sobriety.

Abstract

Background: Despite a growing body of scientific literature exploring the nature of meditation there is limited information on the characteristics of individuals who use it. This is particularly true of comparative studies examining prevalence and predictors of use of various forms of meditation.

Methods: A secondary analysis was conducted using data from the 2012 National Health Interview Survey (n = 34,525). Three popular forms of meditation were compared-mantra, mindfulness, and spiritual-to determine lifetime and 12-month use related to key sociodemographic, health behavior, health status, and healthcare access variables.

Results: The 12-month prevalence for meditation practice was 3.1% for spiritual meditation, 1.9% for mindfulness meditation, and 1.6% for mantra meditation. This represents approximately 7.0, 4.3, and 3.6 million adults respectively. A comparison across the three meditation practices found many similarities in user characteristics, suggesting interest in meditation may be more related to the type of person meditating than to the type of practice selected. Across meditation styles use was more prevalent among respondents who were female, non-Hispanic White, college educated, physically active; who used other complementary health practices; and who reported depression. Higher utilization of conventional healthcare services was one of the strongest predictors of use of all three styles. In addition to similarities, important distinctions were observed. For example, spiritual meditation practice was more prevalent among former drinkers. This may reflect use of spiritual meditation practices in support of alcohol treatment and sobriety. Reasons for use of meditation were examined using the sample of respondents who practiced mindfulness meditation. Wellness and prevention (74%) was a more common reason than use to treat a specific health condition (30%). Common reasons for use included stress management (92%) and emotional well-being (91%), and to support other health behaviors. Meditation was viewed positively because it was self-care oriented (81%) and focused on the whole person (79%).

Conclusion: Meditation appears to provide an accessible, self-care resource that has potential value for mental health, behavioral self-regulation, and integrative medical care. Considering consumer preference for distinct types of meditation practices, understanding the underlying mechanisms, benefits, and applications of practice variations is important.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples Experienced meditators and nonmeditating comparison groups 2008 Cross-sectional study
Neural Correlates of Dispositional Mindfulness During Affect Labeling Adult participants 2007 Observational cross-sectional n = 27
Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). School-aged children and adolescents 2011 Cross-sectional validation study n = 1,413
Mindfulness and self-compassion as predictors of psychological wellbeing in long-term meditators and matched nonmeditators Experienced meditators and demographically matched nonmeditators 2012 Cross-sectional study n = 152
Mechanisms of Action in the Inverse Relationship Between Mindfulness and Psychological Distress Undergraduates 2008 Cross-sectional, correlational

Citations in the library

Explore topics