Skip to content

Buddhist Modernism and the Rhetoric of Meditative Experience

Robert H. Sharf

Numen 1995 DOI: 10.1163/1568527952598549 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Buddhism
Citations 395
Key points Argues that the modern scholarly tendency to interpret Buddhist technical terms as referring to discrete meditative states of consciousness is based on an unquestioned assumption that Buddhist practice is primarily about inculcating religious or mystical experiences.

Abstract

Abstract The category “experience” has played a cardinal role in modern studies of buddhism. Few scholars seem to question the notion that Buddhist monastic practice, particularly meditation, is intended first and foremost to inculcate specific religious or “mystical” experiences in the minds of practitioners. Accordingly, a wide variety of Buddhist technical terms pertaining to the “stages on the path” are subject to a phenomenological hermeneutic—they are interpreted as if they designated discrete “states of consciousness” experienced by historical individuals in the course of their meditative practice.

In the evidence

This study is part of the evidence base for a synthesis in the library. Here is how each one recorded it.

  • Argues that the modern scholarly tendency to interpret Buddhist technical terms as discrete meditative states of consciousness rests on an unquestioned assumption that Buddhist practice is primarily about inculcating religious or mystical experiences.

    Synthesized

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on buddhism, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics