Emptiness and Unknowing
Buddhist Studies Review December 31, 2018 DOI: 10.1558/bsrv.36754 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Topics | Buddhism Meditation Mysticism |
| Keywords | Contemplation Parallels Emptiness Phenomenology philosophy Aesthetics Epistemology Transcendence philosophy Religious studies Psychoanalysis Theology |
| Citations | 1 |
| Key points | Argues that Buddhist and Christian contemplative traditions exhibit specific parallels in techniques, approaches, and the phenomenology of meditative experience, challenging the constructivist view of mystical experiences. |
Abstract
Over the last fifty years the study of mysticism has been shaped by the debate between ‘perennialists’, who claim that mystical experiences are the same across different cultures, and ‘constructivists’, who claim that mystical experiences are shaped by, and hence specific to, particular religious traditions. The constructivist view is associated with the ‘discursive turn’ that has dominated the humanities for the last half century, emphasising cultural relativism. Nonetheless, the constructivist position is not without problems. Inspired in part by Lance Cousins’ 1989 comparison of Buddhaghosa’s Path of Purification and Teresa of Ávila’s Interior Castle, the present article seeks to bring out parallels in the contemplative exercises and the progress of the ‘spiritual life’ found in Buddhist accounts of meditation (such as the C??a-Suññata-sutta) and Christian apophaticism (as presented in The Cloud of Unknowing). The article seeks to establish specific parallels in the techniques of and approaches to contemplative practice in both traditions, as well as in the phenomenology of the experiences of the meditator (yog?vacara) or contemplative at different stages in the work of meditation and contemplation.