Skip to content

Bruno Latour’s Beings of Religion

André Van der Braak

Implicit Religion October 30, 2025 DOI: 10.1558/imre.31422 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Case report Peer reviewed
Topics Buddhism Shamanism
Keywords Ceremony Contemplation Religious experience Philosophy of religion Spirituality Transcendence philosophy Epistemology Ontology Relation database
Citations 1
Key points Argues that Latour's concept of 'beings of religion' provides a useful framework for religious studies, demonstrated through a Latourian analysis of ayahuasca ceremonies.

Abstract

Latour constructs a plurality of ontologies by distinguishing various modes of existence with their own type of existent. One of these modes of existence is religion, which involves invisible “beings of religion.” Latour criticizes both psychological and (onto)theological interpretations of such beings. He distinguishes between psychogenic beings that constitute the self, and beings of religion that transform the self. Whereas psychogenic beings can be addressed through therapeutic or ritual procedures that can provide cure, beings of religion can be addressed through contemplative practices of prayer, meditation, or ceremony that can transform. This article argues that Latour’s beings of religion may have much potential for religious studies and presents a Latourian description of ayahuasca ceremonies as a case study.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on shamanism, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics