No sustained attention differences in a longitudinal randomized trial comparing mindfulness based stress reduction versus active control.
Donal G. Maccoon, Katherine A Maclean, Richard J. Davidson, Clifford D Saron, Antoine Lutz
PLoS One 2014 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097551 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Randomized controlled trial Longitudinal Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 63 |
| Population | Community participants typical of MBSR participants |
| Interventions | Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) Health Enhancement Program (HEP) |
| Duration | 8-week intervention |
| Topics | Meditation |
| Keywords | Mindfulness training Awareness practice Sustained attention Focus Concentration Vigilance Cognitive benefits Cognitive function Cognitive enhancement Mental well-being Brain health Visual discrimination Research study Clinical trial Scientific study Empirical research Comparative study |
| Citations | 97 |
| Registration | NCT01301105 |
| Key findings | MBSR did not improve sustained attention more than an active control condition, though some evidence for improved visual discrimination was found. |
Abstract
Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) is a secular form of meditation training. The vast majority of the extant literature investigating the health effects of mindfulness interventions relies on wait-list control comparisons. Previous studies have found that meditation training over several months is associated with improvements in cognitive control and attention. We used a visual continuous performance task (CPT) to test the effects of eight weeks of mindfulness training on sustained attention by comparing MBSR to the Health Enhancement Program (HEP), a structurally equivalent, active control condition in a randomized, longitudinal design (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01301105) focusing on a non-clinical population typical of MBSR participants. Researchers were blind to group assignment. 63 community participants were randomized to either MBSR (n = 31) or HEP (n = 32). CPT analyses were conducted on 29 MBSR participants and 25 HEP participants. We predicted that MBSR would improve visual discrimination ability and sustained attention over time on the CPT compared to HEP, with more home practice associated with greater improvements. Our hypotheses were not confirmed but we did find some evidence for improved visual discrimination similar to effects in partial replication of other research. Our study had sufficient power to demonstrate that intervention groups do not differ in their improvement over time in sustained attention performance. One of our primary predictions concerning the effects of intervention on attentional fatigue was significant but not interpretable. Attentional sensitivity is not affected by mindfulness practice as taught in MBSR, but it is unclear whether mindfulness might positively affect another aspect of attention, vigilance. These results also highlight the relevant procedural modifications required by future research to correctly investigate the role of sustained attention in similar samples. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01301105.