Skip to content

A systematic review of new empirical data on lucid dream induction techniques.

Shuyue Tan, Jialin Fan

Journal of Sleep Research June 1, 2023 DOI: 10.1111/jsr.13786 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review Peer reviewed
Sample size 19
Population Peer-reviewed studies on lucid dream induction techniques
Topics Lucid dreaming
Keywords Classification Induction methods
Citations 35
Key findings The mnemonic induction of lucid dream technique was the most effective for inducing lucid dreams, and two new techniques, the senses-initiated lucid dream technique and galantamine intervention, are competitive candidates needing further replication.

Abstract

Lucid dreams are defined as dreams in which the dreamers are aware of the fact that they are dreaming as dreams continue. It has been ~12 years since the last review of the efficiency of lucid dream induction techniques was conducted. Hence, the present study aimed to review the lucid dream induction techniques published in the past decade. The second aim was to propose a modified classification for the existing lucid dream induction techniques, including cognitive techniques, external stimulation, substance intervention, and cortical stimulation. The third aim was to assess the methodological quality of the studies included in the review. It was hypothesised that, comparing with the studies included in the last review, the studies included in the present review had better overall methodological quality. A total of 19 peer-reviewed studies were included and analysed in the present review, from which 14 lucid dream induction techniques were identified. The results indicated that the mnemonic induction of lucid dream technique was the most effective for inducing lucid dreams. Moreover, two new techniques, the senses-initiated lucid dream technique and galantamine intervention, might also be competitive candidates for lucid dream induction but further replications are needed. As hypothesised, the overall methodological quality of the studies included in the present review was higher than that of the studies included the previous review. In all, 17 studies had moderate methodological quality, whereas only three studies had poor methodological quality.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on lucid dreaming, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Lucid dreaming incidence: A quality effects meta-analysis of 50 years of research 2016 Meta-analysis
The effectiveness of lucid dreaming therapy in patients with nightmares: A systematic review. Adults with chronic and recurring nightmares 2023 Systematic review
Testing Precognition and an Altered State of Consciousness with Selected Participants in the Ganzfeld Participants selected for self-reported creativity, prior psi experience or belief, or... 2020 Prospective meta-analysis n = 60
The relationship between mindfulness and lucid dreaming: A systematic review. 2025 Systematic review
Review of new evidence on effectiveness of different methods of lucid dream induction Studies on lucid dream induction methods 2024 Systematic review n = 17

Citations in the library

Explore topics