I have recently suggested not to ask what science can do for consciousness but what consciousness can do for science. Here, I extend such a recommendation in the context of naturalism, the meta-ontology shared by most contrasting approaches to the problem of "conscious artificial intelligence": do not ask what naturalism can do for AI but what AI can do for naturalism.
This article presents a taxonomy of altered states of consciousness, primarily based on their central phenomenological features. Following taxonomic principles and a modified Delphi methodology, a multidisciplinary, international group identified eight distinct phenomenological/behavioral states (some with subcategories): proto and transitional, delirium, minimal to no awareness, experiential...