Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Matthew Garner

2 papers in the library · 50 citations · publishing 2025-2026

Papers

Expectancy Effects, Failure of Blinding Integrity, and Placebo Response in Trials of Treatments for Psychiatric Disorders: A Narrative Review.

JAMA Psychiatry May 1, 2025 Nathan T M Huneke, Guilherme Fusetto Veronesi, Matthew Garner et al. 50 citations

Expectancy effects—participants' beliefs about treatment—can bias the results of psychiatric randomized clinical trials by compromising blinding integrity and inflating effect sizes. This narrative review is the first to examine the interplay between expectancy, unblinding, and treatment outcomes in such trials. Evidence from experimental and clinical studies shows that expectation shapes placebo and active treatment responses. Meta-analytic data from psychedelic and anxiety disorder research indicate that unblinding due to perceived efficacy or side effects can alter effect sizes. The authors recommend collecting expectancy data and monitoring blinding integrity, and they propose developing objective outcome measures less susceptible to expectancy effects to improve trial reliability.

The Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Programs for Mental Health Outcomes in Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Mindfulness June 22, 2026 Rose Seneviratne, Valerie Brandt, Matthew Garner et al.

Mindfulness-based programs improve mental health and mindfulness in young adults aged 18–30. A meta-analysis of 132 randomized controlled trials with 6,883 participants in intervention groups and 6,910 controls found significant improvements in anxiety, depression, stress, distress, positive affect, negative affect, and mindfulness facets, with effect sizes greater than 0.29. The most reliable improvements were in monitoring-focused mindfulness facets. Certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to low due to risk of bias and likely publication bias. Multimodal programs, MBCT, MBSR, and their derivations were effective. Intervention and study characteristics explained 6–15% of heterogeneity.