Skip to content

Global Trends in Psychedelic Microdosing: Demographics, Substance Testing Behavior, and Patterns of Use

Rotem Petranker, Valentyn Sobolenko, Zeina Beidas, Stephanie Lake, Philippe Lucas, Omer A. Syed, Emily C. Fewster, Muhammad Ishrat Husain

Journal of Psychoactive Drugs November 6, 2024 DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2024.2424284 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Online survey Peer reviewed
Sample size 6,193
Population Psychedelic consumers who microdose, including exclusive microdosers and those who also use macrodoses
Topics Microdosing
Keywords Demographics Substance use
Citations 9
Key findings Exclusive microdosers differ from those who also use macrodoses in age, sex, ethnicity, urban residence, and lifetime non-psychedelic substance use.

Abstract

Despite psychedelic microdosing being a growing practice, the research on the topic is still in its infancy. While several studies have described the characteristics, motivations and practices of microdosers, the differences between individuals that only microdose and those that use both micro and macrodoses of psychedelics remain unexplored. In an online survey, we collected data of 6193 psychedelic consumers of which 2488 were microdosers of up to 11 different classical and atypical psychedelics. In comparison to respondents that use both microdoses and macrodoses, exclusive microdosers were older in age (46.4 vs. 42.0 years), had a larger proportion of females (68.4% vs. 44.7%), were non-Caucasian (25.4% vs. 14.7%), urban residents (43.9% vs. 38.5%), and had a lower average lifetime use of non-psychedelic substances (3.8 vs. 4.7 substances). Most consumers (52.5%) microdosed psychedelics multiple times a month, commonly using psilocybin (74.5%), LSD (34.4%), and ketamine (15.8%), with most users (64.6%) not testing their substances. The most common reason for microdosing was improving general wellbeing (73.0%), and psychedelics were used for treating several physical and mental health conditions. Additional analyses examined spending habits of consumers. This study adds to the growing literature on the naturalistic use of psychedelic microdosers.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on microdosing, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Motives and Side-Effects of Microdosing With Psychedelics Among Users Psychedelic users with microdosing experience 2019 Cross-sectional survey n = 1,116
Microdosing psychedelics: Motivations, subjective effects and harm reduction People aged 16 years or older who had used psychedelics and could comprehend written... 2019 Cross-sectional survey n = 525
Psychedelic Microdosing: Prevalence and Subjective Effects Anonymous online survey respondents 2020 Cross-sectional survey n = 2,347
Self-Rated Effectiveness of Microdosing With Psychedelics for Mental and Physical Health Problems Among Microdosers Adults 18 or older diagnosed with at least one mental or physiological disorder by a... 2019 Cross-sectional survey n = 410
Microdosing psychedelics: Demographics, practices, and psychiatric comorbidities Adults recruited primarily from the online forum Reddit 2020 Cross-sectional survey n = 909

Citations in the library

Cited by 9

and 4 more in the library

Cites 33

and 28 more in the library

Explore topics