Respons Mahasiswa STAB Kertarajasa Terhadap Praktik Meditasi Vipassana di Padepokan Dhammadipa Arama
Ni Putu Sidi Parwani
Jurnal Ilmiah Kampus: Sati Sampajanna May 31, 2025 DOI: 10.69835/sati.v15i2.720 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Descriptive quantitative survey Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 25 |
| Population | STAB Kertarajasa students in semesters 6 and 8 |
| Topics | Meditation |
| Key findings | Students' overall response to vipassana meditation practice fell in the "heavy" category (77%). Consistency scored highest in the "very heavy" category (84%), followed by benefits (76%), difficulty (73%), and satisfaction (72%). The authors conclude that while students recognize the practice's benefits, they face major challenges with consistency and satisfaction, and recommend adjusting the program. |
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui respon mahasiswa STAB Kertarajasa terhadap praktik meditasi vipassana di Padepokan Dhammadipa Arama. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif deskriptif dengan subjek penelitian sebanyak 25 mahasiswa semester 6 dan 8. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui angket dengan indikator: konsistensi, tingkat kesulitan, manfaat, dan kepuasan terhadap meditasi. Analisis dilakukan dengan menggunakan skala likert. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara keseluruhan respon mahasiswa terhadap praktik meditasi vipassana berada pada kategori “berat” sebesar 77%. Indikator konsistensi memperoleh skor tertinggi pada kategori “sangat berat” (84%), diikuti oleh tingkat kesulitan (73%), manfaat (76%), dan kepuasan (72%). Temuan tersebut menunjukkan bahwa meskipun mahasiswa menyadari manfaat dari praktik meditasi, mereka menghadapi tantangan besar dalam hal konsistensi dan kepuasan selama proses meditasi. Oleh karena itu, perlu adanya evaluasi dan penyesuaian dalam pelaksanaan program meditasi agar lebih sesuai dengan kebutuhan dan kondisi mahasiswa.
Comparable studies
Other cross-sectional and survey studies on meditation, most cited first.
| Study | Year | Design | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples Experienced meditators and nonmeditating comparison groups | 2008 | Cross-sectional study | |
| Neural Correlates of Dispositional Mindfulness During Affect Labeling Adult participants | 2007 | Observational cross-sectional | n = 27 |
| Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). School-aged children and adolescents | 2011 | Cross-sectional validation study | n = 1,413 |
| Mindfulness and self-compassion as predictors of psychological wellbeing in long-term meditators and matched nonmeditators Experienced meditators and demographically matched nonmeditators | 2012 | Cross-sectional study | n = 152 |
| Mechanisms of Action in the Inverse Relationship Between Mindfulness and Psychological Distress Undergraduates | 2008 | Cross-sectional, correlational |