Awareness-related activity in prefrontal and parietal cortices in blindsight reflects more than superior visual performance.
Navindra Persaud, Matthew J Davidson, Brian Maniscalco, Dean Mobbs, Richard E. Passingham, Alan Cowey, Hakwan Lau
Neuroimage September 15, 2011 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.081 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Case study Case report Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 1 |
| Population | A single patient, GY, with unilateral destruction of almost all primary visual cortices, who shows 'blindsight' |
| Key findings | When performance on a visual discrimination task was equated between GY's normal and blind visual fields, stimulation of the normal (conscious) field still produced higher prefrontal and parietal activity, indicating that activity reported in prior awareness studies is not solely due to signal-strength or performance confounds. The authors suggest it may instead reflect a 'metacognitive' capacity associated with awareness, as GY distinguished his own correct from incorrect responses better for his normal field. |
Abstract
Many imaging studies report activity in the prefrontal and parietal cortices when subjects are aware as opposed to unaware of visual stimuli. One possibility is that this activity simply reflects higher signal strength or the superior task performance that is associated with awareness. To find out, we studied the hemianope GY who has unilateral destruction of almost all primary visual cortices. He exhibits 'blindsight', that is, he claims to have no conscious visual phenomenology (i.e., no visual qualia), for stationary stimuli presented to his right visual field (the blind field), although he can press keys to distinguish between different stimuli presented there. We presented to him a visual discrimination task, and equated performance for stimuli presented to the left or right visual field by presenting low contrast stimuli to his normal (left) field and high contrast stimuli to his blind (right) field. Superior accuracy can be a serious confound, and our paradigm allows us to control for it and avoid this confound. Even when performance was matched, and the signal strength was lower, visual stimulation to the normal (conscious) field led to higher activity in the prefrontal and parietal cortices. These results indicate that the activity in the prefrontal and parietal areas that has been reported in previous studies of awareness is not just due to a (signal strength or performance) confounds. One possibility is that it reflects the superior 'metacognitive' capacity that is associated with awareness, because GY was better able to distinguish between his own correct and incorrect responses for stimuli presented to his normal field than to his blind field.
Citations in the library
Cited by 37
- Consciousness in humans and non-human animals: recent advances and future directions Frontiers in Psychology 2013
- Dissociating Perceptual Confidence from Discrimination Accuracy Reveals No Influence of Metacognitive Awareness on Working Memory Frontiers in Psychology June 5, 2016
- Consciousness science: where are we, where are we going, and what if we get there? Frontiers in Science October 30, 2025
- Criterion placement threatens the construct validity of neural measures of consciousness. Elife May 28, 2025
- Confidence Tracks Consciousness* Cambridge University Press eBooks September 30, 2022
and 32 more in the library
Cites 10
- Investigating neural correlates of conscious perception by frequency-tagged neuromagnetic responses Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences March 17, 1998
- Relating introspective accuracy to individual differences in brain structure. Science September 17, 2010
- Unconscious activation of the prefrontal no-go network. Journal of Neuroscience March 17, 2010
- Converging intracranial markers of conscious access. PLoS Biology March 1, 2009
- A higher order Bayesian decision theory of consciousness. Progress in Brain Research 2008
and 5 more in the library