Unconscious activation of the prefrontal no-go network.
Simon van Gaal, K Richard Ridderinkhof, H Steven Scholte, Victor A. F. Lamme
Journal of Neuroscience March 17, 2010 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.2992-09.2010 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Functional magnetic resonance imaging study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Human participants performing a go/no-go task |
| Key points | Unconscious no-go stimuli activated prefrontal control regions, particularly the inferior frontal cortex and pre-supplementary motor area, and this activation was associated with a substantial slowdown in responding, suggesting participants attempted but failed to fully inhibit their response. Activation in this unconscious inhibition network correlated positively with the degree of slowdown. The authors argue that prefrontal cognitive control functions are not exclusively influenced by conscious information. |
Abstract
Cognitive control processes involving prefrontal cortex allow humans to overrule and inhibit habitual responses to optimize performance in new and challenging situations, and traditional views hold that cognitive control is tightly linked with consciousness. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate to what extent unconscious "no-go" stimuli are capable of reaching cortical areas involved in inhibitory control, particularly the inferior frontal cortex (IFC) and the pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA). Participants performed a go/no-go task that included conscious (weakly masked) no-go trials, unconscious (strongly masked) no-go trials, as well as go trials. Replicating typical neuroimaging findings, response inhibition on conscious no-go stimuli was associated with a (mostly right-lateralized) frontoparietal "inhibition network." Here, we demonstrate, however, that an unconscious no-go stimulus also can activate prefrontal control networks, most prominently the IFC and the pre-SMA. Moreover, if it does so, it brings about a substantial slowdown in the speed of responding, as if participants attempted to inhibit their response but just failed to withhold it completely. Interestingly, overall activation in this "unconscious inhibition network" correlated positively with the amount of slowdown triggered by unconscious no-go stimuli. In addition, neural differences between conscious and unconscious control are revealed. These results expand our understanding of the limits and depths of unconscious information processing in the human brain and demonstrate that prefrontal cognitive control functions are not exclusively influenced by conscious information.
Citations in the library
Cited by 31
- The cognitive neuroscience of lucid dreaming Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews March 14, 2019
- The myth of cognitive agency: subpersonal thinking as a cyclically recurring loss of mental autonomy. Frontiers in Psychology 2013
- Dissociating Perceptual Confidence from Discrimination Accuracy Reveals No Influence of Metacognitive Awareness on Working Memory Frontiers in Psychology June 5, 2016
- Anterior insula regulates brain network transitions that gate conscious access Cell Reports May 1, 2021
- Working Memory and Consciousness: The Current State of Play Frontiers in Human Neuroscience March 2, 2018
and 26 more in the library
Cites 4
- Conscious and Nonconscious Processes The MIT Press eBooks May 30, 2008
- Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: a critical review of visual masking. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences May 29, 2007
- A framework for consciousness Nature Neuroscience February 1, 2003
- Introspective physicalism as an approach to the science of consciousness. Cognition April 2001