Skip to content

Measuring consciousness: task accuracy and awareness as sigmoid functions of stimulus duration.

Kristian Sandberg, Bo Martin Bibby, Bert Timmermans, Axel Cleeremans, Morten Overgaard

Consciousness and Cognition December 2011 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.09.002 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Proposes that describing task accuracy and awareness as functions of stimulus intensity, yielding accuracy and awareness curves, offers a way to assess consciousness that addresses limitations of threshold and correlation methods. The lag between curves estimates how much stimulus intensity must increase for awareness to change proportionally as much as accuracy, and curve slopes assess how fast each increases and whether awareness is dichotomous. The method was applied to data from four awareness scales.

Abstract

When consciousness is examined using subjective ratings, the extent to which processing is conscious or unconscious is often estimated by calculating task performance at the subjective threshold or by calculating the correlation between accuracy and awareness. However, both these methods have certain limitations. In the present article, we propose describing task accuracy and awareness as functions of stimulus intensity (thus obtaining an accuracy and an awareness curve) as suggested by Koch and Preuschoff (2007). The estimated lag between the curves describes how much stimulus intensity must increase for awareness to change proportionally as much as accuracy and the slopes of the curves are used to assess how fast accuracy and awareness increases and whether awareness is dichotomous. The method is successfully employed to assess consciousness characteristics on data from four different awareness scales.

Citations in the library

Explore topics