Religious awe: Potential contributions of negative theology to psychology, "positive" or otherwise.
Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 2002 DOI: 10.1037/h0091221 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Citations | 45 |
| Key points | Argues that awe, understood as a variant of the "dark night of the soul," arises from the negative theological state of being "halfway between a 'no longer' and a 'not yet'," and contends that Keltner and Haidt's model of awe is inadequate when compared with Rudolf Otto's phenomenology of religious awe. The author proposes that religious awe remains relevant both to contemporary life and to emotion research. |
Abstract
A hallmark of Christian mysticism is negative theology, which refers to the school of thought that gives prominence to negation in reference to God. By denying the possibility to name God, negative theology cuts at the very root of our cognitive makeup—the human impulse to name and put things into categories—and thereby situates us “halfway between a ‘no longer’ and a ‘not yet’” (Iser, 1978, p. 213), a temporality in which “the past is negated, but . . . the present is not yet formulated” (Iser, 1978, p. 217). The affective corollary of this “no longer” and “not yet” state is the “dark night of the soul” that mystics are known to have bouts of. One particular variant of the “dark night of the soul” is awe, which will be the focus of this paper. My investigation starts with an introduction to the two primary themes of negative theology—negativity and self-reflexivity, followed by a critique of Keltner and Haidt’s model of awe, which is compared with Rudolf Otto’s phenomenology of mysticism in general and religious awe in particular. In the concluding section, I examine the relevance of religious awe to contemporary life on the one hand, and to emotion research on the other. The soul’s greatness takes its measure from its capacity to achieve the flaming vision by which the soul becomes at home in pain. (Heidegger, 1971, p. 18.) Negative theology refers to the school of thought that gives prominence to negation in reference to God. St. Augustine’s statement is a fine example: “God is wise without wisdom, good without goodness, powerful without power” (quoted by Derrida, 1992, p. 113). This mode of thinking and speaking has been a hallmark of Christian mysticism, in which: “Negation is both a means of distinguishing mystical experience from other acts of cognition—“unknowing” from “knowing,” for example—and a corrective to misleading propositions about the being of God” (Lees, 1983, p. 7). How do we understand this “ascendancy of negative over affirmative values” (Lees, 1983, p. 137) in negative theol\\server05\productn\T\THE\22-2\THE204.txt unknown Seq: 2 21-MAR-03 12:52
Citations in the library
Cited by 4
- A conceptual clarification of the experience of awe: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. The Humanistic Psychologist July 1, 2011
- Self-transcendent positive emotions increase spirituality through basic world assumptions Cognition & Emotion May 13, 2013
- Eliciting awe in the spectator: The case of a Dhrupad-based dance performance International Journal of Transpersonal Studies April 26, 2023
- Psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy for existential suffering: Facilitating self-transcendence at the end of life. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies March 18, 2022