The mindful personality: A meta-analysis from a cybernetic perspective.
Adam W. Hanley, Eric L Garland
Mindfulness June 17, 2017 DOI: 10.1007/s12671-017-0736-8 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Meta-analysis Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Measures | Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) |
| Key findings | Across the pooled studies, neuroticism showed the strongest negative relationship with dispositional mindfulness and conscientiousness the strongest positive relationship, suggesting the authors' view that a mindful personality is characterized principally by emotional stability and conscientious self-regulation, possibly reflecting the personality metatrait stability. Associations varied by mindfulness measure, with the FFMQ linked to all five Big Five factors and the MAAS primarily to three. |
Abstract
Dispositional mindfulness (DM), or the tendency to attend to present moment experience, may have important implications for the structure of human personality. However, relationships between DM and the Big Five Model of Personality (BF) have not been definitively established. Therefore, the purpose of this meta-analysis was to extend previous investigations of the relationship between DM and the BF, utilizing a larger sample of studies, attending to relational inconsistencies potentially associated with alternative methods of operationalizing DM, conducting the first meta-analysis of the DM subdomains in relation to the BF, and situating the results in a cybernetic model. Results indicate that neuroticism evidenced the strongest, negative relationship with DM and conscientiousness evidenced the strongest, positive relationship with DM, suggesting the mindful personality may be characterized principally by emotional stability and conscientious self-regulation - potentially reflective of an inclination towards the personality metatrait stability. Measurement differences were also observed, with the mindful personality arrived at through the FFMQ differing to some extent from the mindful personality emerging from the MAAS. Broadly, the mindful personality associated with the FFMQ appears to reflect greater personality complexity, with the FFMQ evidencing associations with all five personality factors while the MAAS appears primarily linked with only three personality factors (Neuroticism, Conscientiousness and Agreeableness). Examination of the relationships between the BF and DM at the facet level also suggest unique patterns of association between the DM facets and each of the personality factors.
Citations in the library
Cited by 13
- The relationship between neuroticism as a personality trait and mindfulness skills: a scoping review Frontiers in Psychology November 15, 2024
- Who Wants to be Mindful? Personality Predictors of Meditation Practice Mindfulness February 1, 2025
- A School-Based Mindfulness Intervention for Adolescent Mental Health: The Moderating Effect of Personality Traits Mindfulness 2026
- The Moderating Role of Personality on the Effects of Concentration-, Ethics- and Wisdom-Based Meditation Practices for Well-Being and Prosociality Healthcare November 25, 2025
- Exploring The Impact Of Focused Attention Meditation On Emotional Distraction: An Experimental Approach July 11, 2023
and 8 more in the library
Cites 31
- The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003
- Using Self-Report Assessment Methods to Explore Facets of Mindfulness Assessment January 27, 2006
- Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice 2004
- Assessment of Mindfulness by Self-Report Assessment September 1, 2004
- The toronto mindfulness scale: Development and validation Journal of Clinical Psychology 2006
and 26 more in the library