Skip to content

The mediating role of pain acceptance during mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for headache.

Melissa A Day, Beverly E Thorn

Complementary Therapies in Medicine April 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2016.01.002 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial Peer reviewed
Sample size 24
Population Individuals with headache pain at the Kilgo Headache Clinic or psychology clinic
Intervention Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT)
Topics Meditation
Keywords Headache Mechanisms Mediation Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy Pain acceptance Theory
Key findings Pain acceptance significantly mediated the relationship between treatment group and pain interference, with activity engagement emerging as a significant mediator while pain willingness did not meet criteria for mediation. The theorized mediating roles of pain catastrophizing and headache management self-efficacy were not supported, as neither significantly predicted pain interference. The authors suggest pain acceptance, specifically engagement in valued activities despite pain, may be a key mechanism underlying improvement during MBCT for headache pain.

Abstract

This study aimed to determine if mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) engenders improvement in headache outcomes via the mechanisms specified by theory: (1) change in psychological process, (i.e., pain acceptance); and concurrently (2) change in cognitive content, (i.e., pain catastrophizing; headache management self-efficacy). A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial comparing MBCT to a medical treatment as usual, delayed treatment (DT) control was conducted. Participants were individuals with headache pain who completed MBCT or DT (N=24) at the Kilgo Headache Clinic or psychology clinic. Standardized measures of the primary outcome (pain interference) and proposed mediators were administered at pre- and post-treatment; change scores were calculated. Bootstrap mediation models were conducted. Pain acceptance emerged as a significant mediator of the group-interference relation (p<.05). Mediation models examining acceptance subscales showed nuances in this effect, with activity engagement emerging as a significant mediator (p<.05), but pain willingness not meeting criteria for mediation due to a non-significant pathway from the mediator to outcome. Criteria for mediation was also not met for the catastrophizing or self-efficacy models as neither of these variables significantly predicted pain interference. Pain acceptance, and specifically engagement in valued activities despite pain, may be a key mechanism underlying improvement in pain outcome during a MBCT for headache pain intervention. The theorized mediating role of cognitive content factors was not supported in this preliminary study. A large, definitive trial is warranted to replicate and extend the findings in order to streamline and optimize MBCT for headache.

Comparable studies

Other randomized controlled trials on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Alterations in Brain and Immune Function Produced by Mindfulness Meditation Healthy employees in a work environment 2003 Randomized controlled trial n = 41
Prevention of relapse/recurrence in major depression by mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. Recovered recurrently depressed patients 2000 Randomized controlled trial n = 145
Open hearts build lives: Positive emotions, induced through loving-kindness meditation, build consequential personal resources. Working adults 2008 Randomized controlled trial n = 139
Short-term meditation training improves attention and self-regulation Undergraduate Chinese students 2007 Randomized controlled trial n = 40
Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Depression: Replication and Exploration of Differential Relapse Prevention Effects. Recovered recurrently depressed patients 2004 Randomized controlled trial n = 73

Citations in the library

Explore topics