Pain acceptance as a change mechanism for mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for migraine.
Rachel D Best, Ali Ozmeral, Amy S Grinberg, Todd A Smitherman, Elizabeth K Seng
Journal of behavioral medicine June 1, 2024 DOI: 10.1007/s10865-024-00475-5 (opens in new tab) via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractPain acceptance, especially the activity engagement component, appears to be a key mechanism by which Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy for Migraine (MBCT-M) reduces headache-related disability. In a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial with 60 participants, pain acceptance, pain willingness, and activity engagement all increased over time in both the MBCT-M and waitlist/treatment-as-usual groups. Only activity engagement increased more in the MBCT-M group. Changes in pain acceptance, pain willingness, and activity engagement each mediated the relationship between MBCT-M and reduced disability. The findings support the importance of pain acceptance, particularly activity engagement, in MBCT-M.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial Longitudinal Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 60 |
| Population | Adults with migraine |
| Intervention | Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy for Migraine (MBCT-M) |
| Duration | One-month post-treatment, with 6-month follow-up for the MBCT-M group |
| Topics | Meditation |
| Keywords | Disability Migraine Pain acceptance |
| Key finding | Change in pain acceptance, particularly the activity engagement component, mediated the relationship between Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy for Migraine and reduced headache-related disability. |
Abstract
Migraine is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. Third wave therapies, such as Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy for Migraine (MBCT-M), have proven efficacious in reducing headache-related disability. However, research is needed to better understand the change mechanisms involved in these third-wave therapies. Acceptance is a fundamental component of third wave therapies, and more research is warranted on the role of pain acceptance in MBCT-M. It is also valuable to understand the independent roles of the two components of pain acceptance-pain willingness (PW) and activity engagement (AE). The current study is a secondary analysis of a randomized control trial of MBCT-M. Sixty participants were included in the study (MBCT = 31; WL/TAU = 29). Baseline correlations between overall pain acceptance, PW, AE, and headache-related disability were run. Mixed models assessed change from baseline to one-month post-treatment and treatment-by-time interaction for overall pain acceptance, PW, and AE. Mixed models also assessed maintenance of changes at 6-month follow-up in the MBCT-M group. Longitudinal mediation models assessed whether change in pain acceptance, PW, and AE mediated the relationship between treatment and change in headache-related disability. Pain acceptance, PW, and AE were all negatively correlated with headache-related disability at baseline. Pain acceptance, PW, and AE all significantly increased over time in both the waitlist/ treatment-as-usual group (WL/TAU) and the MBCT-M group. Only AE increased more in the MBCT group than the WL/TAU group. Change in pain acceptance, PW, and AE all significantly mediated the relationship between MBCT and change in headache-related disability. The study supports the importance of pain acceptance, specifically the activity engagement component, in MBCT-M.