Skip to content

Incorporating others: what an extended self tells us about intersubjectivity

Maria Clara Garavito

Adaptive Behavior August 1, 2018 DOI: 10.1177/1059712318789921 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Citations 17
Key points Argues for a broader account of incorporation than De Preester's narrow version, drawing on Merleau-Ponty's notions of habit and incorporation. On this view, the self as a lived body emerges through constitutive openness to worlds, so objects and even others can be incorporated in a temporal and situated way when they participate in constitutive experiences. Proposes a flexible, transparent self rather than a fixed self grounded in representations of the body.

Abstract

Incorporation is the body’s capacity to take something to alter or extend itself. In the literature on the subject, there is a lively debate on what constitutes incorporation. According to the Hypothesis of Extended Mind, whatever extends our cognitive processes is incorporated. At the same time, that object becomes a part of our self-manifestation. However, De Preester, in what I call a narrow version of incorporation, proposes that an object is incorporated to the self only if it is included in the sense of ownership of the body. Here, I explore a broader version of incorporation, related to Merleau-Ponty’s ideas of habit and incorporation. From this perspective, incorporation is the way a self expands and alters itself in its dealings with the world. A self, as a lived body, emerges in the self’s constitutive openness to worlds; therefore, objects (and even others) are incorporated in a temporal and situated way if they participate in constitutive experiences. Finally, this perspective explores the idea of a flexible and transparent self rather than a fixed self based on representations of the body.

Citations in the library

Explore topics