Skip to content

Intercorporeality and the Problem of Other Minds

Valentina Cuccio

Acta Analytica June 1, 2026 DOI: 10.1007/s12136-025-00660-4 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Intercorporeality Embodied intersubjectivity Embodied metaphors Schizophrenia
Citations 1
Key points Argues that the capacity to recognize others as epistemic agents is rooted in pre-reflective intersubjectivity and bodily self-experience, and that disturbances of embodiment can undermine this recognition.

Abstract

This paper develops an embodied account of the problem of other minds. I argue that our capacity to recognize others, and to be recognized by them, as individuals capable of subjective experience and knowledge, is rooted in a pre-reflective intersubjectivity, articulated through Merleau-Ponty’s notion of intercorporeality. On this view, the body plays a twofold role. At a basic level, social understanding arises through bodily attunement: in perceiving others’actions, our bodies simulate their experiences, thereby generating a corporeal mode of understanding. At a second level, the body contributes to the construction of meaning, as suggested by data on the embodiment of language and, specifically, on the embodiment of metaphors. This twofold role of the body is clarified through the case of schizophrenia. Reframing the problem of other minds in embodied terms carries epistemological implications. If the recognition of others as epistemic agents is rooted in bodily self-experience, disturbances of embodiment undermine the very conditions of epistemic relatedness.