Skip to content

Perceptual consciousness and cognitive access from the perspective of capacity-unlimited working memory

Steven Gross

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences July 30, 2018 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0343 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Citations 41
Key points Argues that recent working memory research challenges the shared assumption that cognitive access has limited representational capacity, and that abandoning this assumption undermines post-cue-based 'overflow' arguments for rich perceptual consciousness without cognitive access. It further contends that dropping the assumption dissociates the rich/sparse debate from the access question, and explores reformulated overflow theses and the relation between non-probabilistic perceptual consciousness and probabilistic representations.

Abstract

Theories of consciousness divide over whether perceptual consciousness is rich or sparse in specific representational content and whether it requires cognitive access. These two issues are often treated in tandem because of a shared assumption that the representational capacity of cognitive access is fairly limited. Recent research on working memory challenges this shared assumption. This paper argues that abandoning the assumption undermines post-cue-based 'overflow' arguments, according to which perceptual consciousness is rich and does not require cognitive access. Abandoning it also dissociates the rich/sparse debate from the access question. The paper then explores attempts to reformulate overflow theses in ways that do not require the assumption of limited capacity. Finally, it discusses the problem of relating seemingly non-probabilistic perceptual consciousness to the probabilistic representations posited by the models that challenge conceptions of cognitive access as capacity-limited.This article is part of the theme issue 'Perceptual consciousness and cognitive access'.

Citations in the library