Skip to content

Cognition Without Neural Representation: Dynamics of a Complex System.

Inês Hipólito

Frontiers in Psychology January 12, 2022 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643276 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Dynamical systems theory Dynamic causal modelling Neural representation Neurocognitive activity
Key points Argues that neural representation is an assumption derived from computational modelling rather than a necessary feature of neurocognitive activity, and proposes a dynamical account of neurocognitive activity that combines Dynamical Causal Modelling with dynamical systems theory and Embodied and Enactive Cognitive Science.

Abstract

This paper proposes an account of neurocognitive activity without leveraging the notion of neural representation. Neural representation is a concept that results from assuming that the properties of the models used in computational cognitive neuroscience (e.g., information, representation, etc.) must literally exist the system being modelled (e.g., the brain). Computational models are important tools to test a theory about how the collected data (e.g., behavioural or neuroimaging) has been generated. While the usefulness of computational models is unquestionable, it does not follow that neurocognitive activity should literally entail the properties construed in the model (e.g., information, representation). While this is an assumption present in computationalist accounts, it is not held across the board in neuroscience. In the last section, the paper offers a dynamical account of neurocognitive activity with Dynamical Causal Modelling (DCM) that combines dynamical systems theory (DST) mathematical formalisms with the theoretical contextualisation provided by Embodied and Enactive Cognitive Science (EECS).

Citations in the library