Cognition Without Neural Representation: Dynamics of a Complex System.
Frontiers in Psychology January 12, 2022 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643276 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Dynamical systems theory Dynamic causal modelling Neural representation Neurocognitive activity |
| Key points | Argues that neural representation is an assumption derived from computational modelling rather than a necessary feature of neurocognitive activity, and proposes a dynamical account of neurocognitive activity that combines Dynamical Causal Modelling with dynamical systems theory and Embodied and Enactive Cognitive Science. |
Abstract
This paper proposes an account of neurocognitive activity without leveraging the notion of neural representation. Neural representation is a concept that results from assuming that the properties of the models used in computational cognitive neuroscience (e.g., information, representation, etc.) must literally exist the system being modelled (e.g., the brain). Computational models are important tools to test a theory about how the collected data (e.g., behavioural or neuroimaging) has been generated. While the usefulness of computational models is unquestionable, it does not follow that neurocognitive activity should literally entail the properties construed in the model (e.g., information, representation). While this is an assumption present in computationalist accounts, it is not held across the board in neuroscience. In the last section, the paper offers a dynamical account of neurocognitive activity with Dynamical Causal Modelling (DCM) that combines dynamical systems theory (DST) mathematical formalisms with the theoretical contextualisation provided by Embodied and Enactive Cognitive Science (EECS).
Citations in the library
Cited by 2
Cites 8
- The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition Oxford University Press eBooks September 13, 2018
- Ongoing Cortical Activity at Rest: Criticality, Multistability, and Ghost Attractors Journal of Neuroscience March 7, 2012
- Evolving Enactivism The MIT Press eBooks May 19, 2017
- The Active Inference Approach to Ecological Perception: General Information Dynamics for Natural and Artificial Embodied Cognition Frontiers in Robotics and AI March 8, 2018
- Why Brains Are Not Computers, Why Behaviorism Is Not Satanism, and Why Dolphins Are Not Aquatic Apes. The Behavior Analyst May 1, 2016
and 3 more in the library