Skip to content

True Consciousness Science Requires Strongly Dynamically-Unorthodox Physics

Nicholas Martin Rosseinsky

August 18, 2021 preprint DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/v9yrp (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper
Citations 2
Key points Argues that a scientifically reliable science of consciousness is impossible under dynamically-orthodox physics, such as current physical theory, but that under a strong form of dynamically-unorthodox physics subjective report is not provably unreliable and thus meets the minimal necessary conditions for a true science. The author presents this as resolving the conflict between two recent papers on whether a science of consciousness can exist.

Abstract

Whether there can be a science of consciousness is both of the utmost importance, and a matter of intense current debate in the field. Recently, two major papers seemed to reach dramatically conflicting conclusions, one denying scientific method currently exists in the field, the other promoting a way to ‘make the hard problem easier’. Here I apply uncontroversial mathematical physics together with a new symbolism for conscious experience, to decisively resolve this issue. Under dynamically-orthodox physics (e.g. current physical theory), there can’t be a scientifically-reliable approach. But under a strong form of dynamically-unorthodox physics, subjective report is not provably unreliable, thus meeting the minimal necessary conditions for a true science. Implications for the epistemological foundations of science are briefly discussed. (For a more accessible, publication-friendly, presentation of this article's approach, please see https://psyarxiv.com/c67x9/.)

Citations in the library

Explore topics