Skip to content

The measurement of consciousness: a framework for the scientific study of consciousness.

David Gamez

Frontiers in Psychology July 10, 2014 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00714 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Philosophy of mind
Keywords Measurement Consciousness Correlates First-person report Causal closure
Key points Argues that a framework of definitions and assumptions can explain how consciousness is measured, addressing problems with first-person reports and the causal closure of the physical world without assuming consciousness is entirely physical or functional. The author proposes that this framework preserves theory-neutrality, is compatible with most current theories of consciousness, and distinguishes two types of correlates of consciousness.

Abstract

Scientists studying consciousness are attempting to identify correlations between measurements of consciousness and the physical world. Consciousness can only be measured through first-person reports, which raises problems about the accuracy of first-person reports, the possibility of non-reportable consciousness and the causal closure of the physical world. Many of these issues could be resolved by assuming that consciousness is entirely physical or functional. However, this would sacrifice the theory-neutrality that is a key attraction of a correlates-based approach to the study of consciousness. This paper puts forward a different solution that uses a framework of definitions and assumptions to explain how consciousness can be measured. This addresses the problems associated with first-person reports and avoids the issues with the causal closure of the physical world. This framework is compatible with most of the current theories of consciousness and it leads to a distinction between two types of correlates of consciousness.

Citations in the library

Explore topics