Skip to content

Aspects of Self-Awareness in Meditators and Meditation-Naïve Participants: Self-Report Versus Task Performance

Ivan Nyklíček

Mindfulness April 1, 2020 DOI: 10.1007/s12671-020-01318-5 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational cross-sectional comparison of experienced meditators and matched controls Peer reviewed
Sample size 82
Population 35 experienced meditators and 47 matched control participants
Topics Meditation
Key findings Meditators reported higher introspective interest and mindfulness skills than controls but did not differ in emotional awareness, while showing higher interoception scores during spontaneous verbal reports. Among meditators, mindfulness/Vipassana practitioners scored lower than transcendental meditators on a self-reported mindfulness skill yet reported more momentary interoceptive and exteroceptive phenomena, differences the authors describe as large. The authors argue these partially opposing results indicate the added value of behavioral tasks for assessing awareness-related phenomena.

Abstract

Abstract:

Objectives: Meditation may be viewed as a way to enhance mindfulness and self-awareness. To date, most studies have relied on instruments based on self-evaluations. The aim of this study was to explore aspects of self-awareness in experienced meditators compared to non-meditators using a multi-method approach.

Methods: Thirty-five experienced meditators and 47 matched control participants completed tests ranging from self-report questionnaires of mindfulness skills and psychological mindedness to emotion reports in a scenario task and a behavioral task in which spontaneous momentary experiences are verbally reported.

Results: Compared to controls, meditators scored higher on self-reported introspective interest and mindfulness skills, but not on emotional awareness. Meditators also showed higher interoception scores during the spontaneous verbal reports task. Interestingly, while mindfulness/Vipassana meditators scored lower on a self-reported mindfulness skill compared to transcendental meditators, they reported more momentary interoceptive and exteroceptive phenomena during the task, the differences being large.

Conclusions: Different methods assessing complementary aspects of self-awareness show partially mutually opposing results when meditator and non-meditator groups are compared. These results indicate the added value of behavioral tasks when assessing awareness-related phenomena.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples Experienced meditators and nonmeditating comparison groups 2008 Cross-sectional study
Neural Correlates of Dispositional Mindfulness During Affect Labeling Adult participants 2007 Observational cross-sectional n = 27
Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). School-aged children and adolescents 2011 Cross-sectional validation study n = 1,413
Mindfulness and self-compassion as predictors of psychological wellbeing in long-term meditators and matched nonmeditators Experienced meditators and demographically matched nonmeditators 2012 Cross-sectional study n = 152
Mechanisms of Action in the Inverse Relationship Between Mindfulness and Psychological Distress Undergraduates 2008 Cross-sectional, correlational

Citations in the library

Explore topics