Functionally Effective Conscious AI Without Suffering
A. Agarwal, S. Edelman
Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness March 1, 2020 DOI: 10.1142/s2705078520300030 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that the ethics of building conscious AI should address not only how such systems behave but also how to avoid condemning them to unavoidable suffering arising from phenomenal self-consciousness, and proposes two complementary approaches: one from philosophical analysis of the phenomenal self and one from reinforcement learning concepts. |
Abstract
Insofar as consciousness has a functional role in facilitating learning and behavioral control, the builders of autonomous Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems are likely to attempt to incorporate it into their designs. The extensive literature on the ethics of AI is concerned with ensuring that AI systems, and especially autonomous conscious ones, behave ethically. In contrast, our focus here is on the rarely discussed complementary aspect of engineering conscious AI: how to avoid condemning such systems, for whose creation we would be solely responsible, to unavoidable suffering brought about by phenomenal self-consciousness. We outline two complementary approaches to this problem, one motivated by a philosophical analysis of the phenomenal self, and the other by certain computational concepts in reinforcement learning.
Citations in the library
Cited by 5
- Conscious artificial intelligence in service Journal of Service Management October 20, 2025
- Artificial consciousness: a perspective from the free energy principle Philosophical Studies June 26, 2024
- The conductor model of consciousness, our neuromorphic twins, and the human-AI deal PsyArXiv December 12, 2023
- Artificial consciousness: the missing ingredient for ethical AI? Frontiers in Robotics and AI November 23, 2023
- Artificial Suffering: An Argument for a Global Moratorium on Synthetic Phenomenology Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness March 1, 2021
Cites 9
- The myth of cognitive agency: subpersonal thinking as a cyclically recurring loss of mental autonomy. Frontiers in Psychology 2013
- The Subjectivity of Subjective Experience: A Representationalist Analysis of the First-Person Perspective The MIT Press eBooks August 28, 2000
- Learning to Be Conscious. Trends in Cognitive Sciences February 1, 2020
- Reconstructing and deconstructing the self: Cognitive mechanisms in meditation practice Trends in Cognitive Sciences July 28, 2015
- The Radical Plasticity Thesis: How the brain learns to be conscious Frontiers in Psychology May 22, 2014
and 4 more in the library