Multiscale integration: beyond internalism and externalism.
Maxwell J D Ramstead, Michael D Kirchhoff, Axel Constant, Karl Friston
Synthese February 21, 2019 DOI: 10.1007/s11229-019-02115-x (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Enactive cognition Embodied cognition Externalism Internalism Markov blankets Boundaries of cognition |
| Key points | Argues that the statistical seclusion of internal from external states entailed by a Markov boundary can coexist with multiscale integration of a cognitive system through its dynamics. Contends that no particular boundary (brain, body, or world) is privileged, and that the relevant boundaries of cognition depend on the level being characterized and the explanatory interests guiding investigation, offering a multiscale ontology as a multidisciplinary research heuristic. |
Abstract
We present a multiscale integrationist interpretation of the boundaries of cognitive systems, using the Markov blanket formalism of the variational free energy principle. This interpretation is intended as a corrective for the philosophical debate over internalist and externalist interpretations of cognitive boundaries; we stake out a compromise position. We first survey key principles of new radical (extended, enactive, embodied) views of cognition. We then describe an internalist interpretation premised on the Markov blanket formalism. Having reviewed these accounts, we develop our positive multiscale account. We argue that the statistical seclusion of internal from external states of the system-entailed by the existence of a Markov boundary-can coexist happily with the multiscale integration of the system through its dynamics. Our approach does not privilege any given boundary (whether it be that of the brain, body, or world), nor does it argue that all boundaries are equally prescient. We argue that the relevant boundaries of cognition depend on the level being characterised and the explanatory interests that guide investigation. We approach the issue of how and where to draw the boundaries of cognitive systems through a multiscale ontology of cognitive systems, which offers a multidisciplinary research heuristic for cognitive science.
Citations in the library
Cited by 20
- Embodied and Enactive Approaches to Cognition Cambridge University Press eBooks October 31, 2023
- The first prior: From co-embodiment to co-homeostasis in early life. Consciousness and Cognition May 1, 2021
- From Generative Models to Generative Passages: A Computational Approach to (Neuro) Phenomenology. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2022
- Interpersonal attunement in social interactions: from collective psychophysiology to inter-personalized psychiatry and beyond. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences February 13, 2023
- Brain Entropy During Aging Through a Free Energy Principle Approach Frontiers in Human Neuroscience March 22, 2021
and 15 more in the library
Cites 10
- A tale of two densities: active inference is enactive inference. Adaptive Behavior August 1, 2020
- From cognitivism to autopoiesis: towards a computational framework for the embodied mind. Synthese 2018
- Active inference, enactivism and the hermeneutics of social cognition. Synthese 2018
- Enactivism and predictive processing: a non-representational view Philosophical Explorations May 4, 2018
- How to Knit Your Own Markov Blanket: PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) 2017
and 5 more in the library