Skip to content

Compassion as a Skill: A Comparison of Contemplative and Evolution-Based Approaches

Paul Gilbert, William van Gordon

Mindfulness August 3, 2023 DOI: 10.1007/s12671-023-02173-w (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Citations 49
Key points Argues that evolutionary and contemplative approaches to compassion share the goal of understanding and preventing suffering but differ in training: evolutionary models such as compassion focused therapy rely on thinking, empathizing, reflection, and guided behavior change, whereas contemplative traditions emphasize meditation and direct experiencing to settle the mind so self-transcendent compassion can arise. Contends that evolutionary approaches do not pursue transcendent wisdoms or insights.

Abstract

Abstract The editors to this volume posed a series of fascinating questions relating to how seeing compassion as a skill can help us understand its nature, cultivation and effects within secular contexts. This paper addresses these questions by comparing evolutionary with contemplative approaches to compassion. Recent scientific approaches have explored the evolved roots and biopsychosocial manifestations of compassion and their impact on mental states and prosocial behaviour, particularly in regard to both its facilitators and inhibitors. In contrast, we discuss how the contemplative traditions have approached the origins and cultivation of compassion through observing the mind (e.g. meditation), with a focus on gaining insight into self-transcendent experiences, the nature of inter-connectivity and non-separate existence (also referred to as non-duality), through which compassion arises naturally. Both evolutionary and contemplative perspectives have the same focus which is to understand and prevent the causes of suffering, including the suffering we cause ourselves because of our harmful potentials. However, in terms of training the mind in compassion skills, this paper considers how training approaches linked to the evolutionary model often use thinking, empathising, reflecting and guided behaviour change to activate psychophysiological systems linked to caring and compassion. In contrast, the contemplative traditions focus less on thinking and reflecting and more on creating conditions for direct experiencing. A key reason for doing so is to settle the mind so that subtler levels of consciousness can enable the experience of self-transcendent compassion to arise. Thus, both evolutionary and contemplative approaches can focus on developing mind awareness and the importance of practise, but evolutionary approaches such as compassion focused therapy do not pursue transcendent wisdoms or insights.

Citations in the library

Explore topics