Skip to content

The Impossible Possibility of Palmquist’s Kant and Mysticism

Chris L. Firestone

Kantian Review December 21, 2020 DOI: 10.1017/s1369415420000485 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Review Peer reviewed
Topics Mysticism
Key findings The reviewer argues that while Palmquist's book successfully disturbs the standard portrait of Kant as the all-destroyer of metaphysics and religious experience, his argument for a 'Critical mysticism' spanning the Critical philosophy and Opus Postumum is inconclusive, since it is impossible to know whether his interpretation of the Opus Postumum is more right than its competitors; the conflict of interpretations makes it a hermeneutic 'impossible possibility.'

Abstract

Abstract Stephen R. Palmquist’s Kant and Mysticism revisits his earlier work on Kant and Swedenborg, arguing that, contrary to standard interpretations, the arguments of Dreams of a Spirit-Seer expand into ‘Critical mysticism’ throughout the Critical philosophy and into the Opus Postumum. Although the beginning portions of Palmquist’s book successfully disturb the standard portrait of Kant as the all-destroyer of metaphysics and religious experience, his argument for critical mysticism is inconclusive. It is impossible to know if his interpretation of the Opus Postumum is more right than its competitors. The conflict of interpretations shows Palmquist’s interpretation to be a hermeneutic impossible possibility.

Comparable studies

Other narrative reviews on mysticism, most cited first.

Explore topics