Skip to content

Hyper–Kantianism in Recent Discussions of Mystical Experience

J. William Forgie

Religious Studies June 1, 1985 DOI: 10.1017/s0034412500017194 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Mystical experience
Key points Argues that the debate over mystical experience turns on competing views of the experience-interpretation relation: the 'traditional view' associated with Stace, which supports the doctrine of unanimity, versus a 'hyper-Kantian' picture advanced by critics who see interpretation as shaping experience and who reject unanimity.

Abstract

Much work on mystical experience has taken for granted a certain view about the relation between experience and its interpretation. This ‘traditional view’ has received perhaps its most explicit statement in Stace's Mysticism and Philosophy. It is a view which is attractive to proponents of the doctrine of unanimity, the doctrine (roughly put) that at the phenomenological level all mystical experiences are basically similar. Recently, however, in a growing body of literature, the traditional view has come under heavy fire. Its critics adopt a Kantian, indeed a hyper–Kantian, picture of experience. And they see the traditional view, accordingly, as ‘naïve’ and ‘simplistic’. In addition, hyper–Kantians typically reject the doctrine of unanimity.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on mystical experience, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics