Scientific practice as ecological-enactive co-construction
Guilherme Sanches de Oliveira, Thomas Van Es, Inês Hipólito
Synthese June 22, 2023 DOI: 10.1007/s11229-023-04215-1 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Citations | 16 |
| Key points | Argues that science, scientific practice, and scientific knowledge are best understood through an ecological-enactive co-construction framework that integrates niche construction theory with embodied cognitive science. Proposes reframing theory as practice and reconceptualizing scientific knowledge as relational and world-involving, while distinguishing this view from narrower conceptions of "cognitive niche construction." |
Abstract
Abstract Philosophy of science has undergone a naturalistic turn, moving away from traditional idealized concerns with the logical structure of scientific theories and toward focusing on real-world scientific practice, especially in domains such as modeling and experimentation. As part of this shift, recent work has explored how the project of philosophically understanding science as a natural phenomenon can be enriched by drawing from different fields and disciplines, including niche construction theory in evolutionary biology, on the one hand, and ecological and enactive views in embodied cognitive science, on the other. But these insights have so far been explored in separation from each other, without clear indication of whether they can work together. Moreover, the focus on particular practices, however insightful, has tended to lack consideration of potential further implications for a naturalized understanding of science as a whole (i.e., above and beyond those particular practices). Motivated by these developments, here we sketch a broad-ranging view of science, scientific practice and scientific knowledge in terms of ecological-enactive co-construction. The view we propose situates science in the biological, evolutionary context of human embodied cognitive activity aimed at addressing the demands of life. This motivates reframing theory as practice, and reconceptualizing scientific knowledge in ecological terms, as relational and world-involving. Our view also brings to the forefront of attention the fundamental link between ideas about the nature of mind, of science and of nature itself, which we explore by outlining how our proposal differs from more conservative, and narrower, conceptions of “cognitive niche construction.”
Citations in the library
Cites 14
- Why Brains Are Not Computers, Why Behaviorism Is Not Satanism, and Why Dolphins Are Not Aquatic Apes. The Behavior Analyst May 1, 2016
- Are plants cognitive? A reply to Adams. Studies in history and philosophy of science February 1, 2019
- Thinking through enactive agency: sense-making, bio-semiosis and the ontologies of organismic worlds Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences March 2, 2018
- Agency From a Radical Embodied Standpoint: An Ecological-Enactive Proposal. Frontiers in Psychology 2020
- Enactment and construction of the cognitive niche: toward an ontology of the mind-world connection Synthese March 15, 2018
and 9 more in the library