Enactive Pragmatism and Ecological Psychology.
Frontiers in Psychology 2020 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.538644 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Physarum polycephalum Affect and value Ecological psychology Enactivism Gut microbiome Pragmatism and phenomenology Realism vs. constructivism |
| Citations | 34 |
| Key points | Argues that a pragmatic version of enactive constructivism does not obviate ecological realism and that agent-enacted values have the same external status as ecological affordances. |
Abstract
A widely cited roadblock to bridging ecological psychology and enactivism is that the former identifies with realism and the latter identifies with constructivism, which critics charge is subjectivist. A pragmatic reading, however, suggests non-mental forms of constructivism that simultaneously fit core tenets of enactivism and ecological realism. After advancing a pragmatic version of enactive constructivism that does not obviate realism, I reinforce the position with an empirical illustration: Physarum polycephalum, a communal unicellular organism that leaves slime trails that form chemical barriers that it avoids in foraging explorations. Here, environmental building and sensorimotor engagement are part of the same process with P. polycephalum coordinating around self-created, affordance-bearing geographies, which nonetheless exist independently in ways described by ecological realists. For ecological psychologists, affordances are values, meaning values are external to the perceiver. I argue that agent-enacted values have the same status and thus do not obviate ecological realism or generate subjectivism. The constructivist-realist debate organizes around the emphasis that enactivists and ecological theorists respectively place on the inner constitution of organisms vs. the structure of environments. Building on alimentary themes introduced in the P. polycephalum example and also in Gibson's work, I go on to consider how environment, brain, visceral systems, and even bacteria within them enter perceptual loops. This highlights almost unfathomable degrees of mutually modulating internal and external synchronization. It also shows instances in which internal conditions alter worldly configurations and invert values, in Gibson's sense of the term, albeit without implying subjectivism. My aim is to cut across the somatic focus of enactive constructivism and the external environment-oriented emphasis of ecological realism and show that enactivism can enrich ecological accounts of value.
Citations in the library
Cited by 4
- Enacting Media. An Embodied Account of Enculturation Between Neuromediality and New Cognitive Media Theory. Frontiers in Psychology 2021
- Enactivism and Material Culture: How Enactivism Could Redefine Enculturation Processes Philosophies July 4, 2022
- Enactivism: Progressive, Pluralist—or Just Halfway Empiricism? Adaptive Behavior March 9, 2026
- Foreign Language Learning Under an Ecological–Enactive Approach Languages February 26, 2026
Cites 9
- Reconceiving representation-hungry cognition: an ecological-enactive proposal Adaptive Behavior May 23, 2018
- Mind After Uexküll: A Foray Into the Worlds of Ecological Psychologists and Enactivists. Frontiers in Psychology 2020
- Ecological Psychology and Enactivism: Perceptually-Guided Action vs. Sensation-Based Enaction. Frontiers in Psychology 2020
- Agency From a Radical Embodied Standpoint: An Ecological-Enactive Proposal. Frontiers in Psychology 2020
- Scale Matters: Temporality in the Perception of Affordances. Frontiers in Psychology 2020
and 4 more in the library