Skip to content

Lived experience and the naturalization of bodily experience: An ecological proposal

M. Heras-Escribano, Pablo López-silva, Lorena Lobo

Theory & Psychology August 1, 2025 DOI: 10.1177/09593543251355149 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Argues that ecological psychology can naturalize Husserlian lived experience, including kinesthetics and proprioception, despite claims that its focus on goal-directed tasks leaves it ill-equipped compared with enactivism. Concludes that all relevant aspects of the Husserlian notion can be accounted for within ecological psychology, providing materials for an embodied, situated naturalization of bodily experience.

Abstract

In this paper we defend the idea that ecological psychology is in a good position for making sense of bodily experience by naturalizing some of the most important features of Husserlian lived experience, such as kinesthetics or proprioception. Some postcognitivist researchers have suggested that the notion of lived experience, originated in Husserl’s phenomenological project, is fundamental to make sense of the concept of bodily experience. Recently, it has been suggested that, when considering Husserl’s notion of lived experience, ecological psychology lacks the conceptual resources to make sense of this notion, for it is focused on goal-directed tasks. In contrast, enactivism is allegedly in better shape to make sense of the concept due to its direct roots in the phenomenological tradition. After contextualizing the debate, in this paper we claim that all the relevant aspects attributed to the Husserlian notion of lived experience can be accounted for within the scientific framework of ecological psychology. We conclude that there are enough materials to start defining an embodied and situated naturalization of the notion of bodily experience from an ecological perspective.