Skip to content

“Shamanic Illness” of the Prophet Ezekiel: Criticism of the Concept

A. Gasymov

The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University Series Political Science and Religion Studies 2024 DOI: 10.26516/2073-3380.2024.48.140 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Shamanism
Key points Argues that Yong-Chi Rhie's reading of Ezekiel's calling as a shamanic illness fails because it omits central elements of shamanic illness, such as spirit possession, the candidate's suffering, and initiation into mudang, and because Ezekiel's calling narrative conforms to the typical pattern of Old Testament prophetic call accounts.

Abstract

This article is devoted to refuting the concept of Yong-Chi Rhie, who proposes to read the narrative of the calling of the prophet Ezekiel as a shamanic illness (in Korean shamanism). Since the author investigates the story in question as such, without textual criticism, the refutation of the researcher's concept is constructed from within the biblical corpus. To analyze the problem, all key elements of both the shamanic illness and the calling of the biblical prophets are parsed in detail. It is noted that the comparison of the two phenomena – shamanic illness and the calling of a prophet – omits a number of important elements (spirit possession, physical and psychological suffering of the shamanic candidate, and the ritual of initiation into mudang). The paper emphasizes the biblical context of the calling of the prophets. A detailed examination of the account of the calling of the prophet Ezekiel reveals that this narrative is typical of such narratives in the Old Testament.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on shamanism, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics