Beyond Reduction
Steven Horst
October 1, 2007 DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195317114.001.0001 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that post-reductionist philosophy of science poses problems for all familiar positions in the philosophy of mind and calls for a deep rethinking of the problematic, urging a new perspective called Cognitive Pluralism. |
Abstract
AbstractContemporary debates in philosophy of mind‐between reductionists, dualists, nonreductive materialists, and eliminativists‐have been based upon the perception that mental phenomena like consciousness and intentionality are uniquely irreducible. The “explanatory gap” between mind and body seems to be an urgent and fascinating problem if one assumes that intertheoretic reductions are the rule in the special sciences, with the mind as the lone exception. While this debate was going on in philosophy of mind, however, philosophers of science were rejecting this very sort of reductionism: intertheoretic reductions are not ubiquitous but rare. This book argues that post‐reductionist philosophy of science poses problems for all the familiar positions in philosophy of mind and calls for a deep rethinking of the problematic. To this end, a new perspective, Cognitive Pluralism, is urged.
Citations in the library
Cited by 3
- Closing in on the constitution of consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology 2014
- Feasibility of the Mechanistic Explanation in the Case of Near-Death Experiences: Nothing but a Reductionism? Synthese Library 2026
- The correlation/constitution distinction problem Advances in Consciousness Research June 17, 2015