The Vegetative State and the Science of Consciousness
N. Shea, Tim Bayne
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science September 1, 2010 DOI: 10.1093/bjps/axp046 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that the standard approach to inferring consciousness from voluntary behavior and neural evidence is inadequate for vegetative state patients who fail such tests, and proposes a cluster-based 'natural kind' methodology as a replacement for both this clinical context and the broader science of consciousness. |
Abstract
Consciousness in experimental subjects is typically inferred from reports and other forms of voluntary behaviour. A wealth of everyday experience confirms that healthy subjects do not ordinarily behave in these ways unless they are conscious. Investigation of consciousness in vegetative state patients has been based on the search for neural evidence that such broad functional capacities are preserved in some vegetative state patients. We call this the standard approach. To date, the results of the standard approach have suggested that some vegetative state patients might indeed be conscious, although they fall short of being demonstrative. The fact that some vegetative state patients show evidence of consciousness according to the standard approach is remarkable, for the standard approach to consciousness is rather conservative, and leaves open the pressing question of how to ascertain whether patients who fail such tests are conscious or not. We argue for a cluster-based ‘natural kind’ methodology that is adequate to that task, both as a replacement for the approach that currently informs research into the presence or absence of consciousness in vegetative state patients and as a methodology for the science of consciousness more generally. 1. Introduction2. The Vegetative State3. The Standard Approach4. The Natural Kind Methodology5. Is Consciousness a Special Case? 5.1 Is consciousness a natural kind? 5.2 A special obstacle?6. Conclusion Introduction The Vegetative State The Standard Approach The Natural Kind Methodology Is Consciousness a Special Case? 5.1 Is consciousness a natural kind? 5.2 A special obstacle? 5.1 Is consciousness a natural kind? 5.2 A special obstacle? Conclusion
Citations in the library
Cited by 33
- Theories of consciousness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience July 1, 2022
- Are There Levels of Consciousness? Trends in Cognitive Sciences April 22, 2016
- The search for invertebrate consciousness. Noûs March 1, 2022
- Are There Islands of Awareness? Trends in Neurosciences December 10, 2019
- Animal sentience Philosophy Compass March 17, 2022
and 28 more in the library
Cites 4
- Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State Science September 7, 2006
- Consciousness in Contemporary Science Oxford University Press eBooks March 12, 1992
- Response to Comments on "Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State" Science March 2, 2007
- A neuronal network model linking subjective reports and objective physiological data during conscious perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences July 8, 2003