Skip to content

Animal sentience

Heather Browning, Jonathan Birch

Philosophy Compass March 17, 2022 DOI: 10.1111/phc3.12822 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Review Peer reviewed
Citations 136
Key findings The authors argue that uncertainty about sentience in fish and invertebrates can be addressed through precautionary policy-making and by adapting methods from human consciousness science to disentangle conscious from unconscious perception and affect in animals. They contend that better ways to distinguish conscious from unconscious affect are a key research priority.

Abstract

'Sentience' sometimes refers to the capacity for any type of subjective experience, and sometimes to the capacity to have subjective experiences with a positive or negative valence, such as pain or pleasure. We review recent controversies regarding sentience in fish and invertebrates and consider the deep methodological challenge posed by these cases. We then present two ways of responding to the challenge. In a policy-making context, precautionary thinking can help us treat animals appropriately despite continuing uncertainty about their sentience. In a scientific context, we can draw inspiration from the science of human consciousness to disentangle conscious and unconscious perception (especially vision) in animals. Developing better ways to disentangle conscious and unconscious affect is a key priority for future research.

Citations in the library