Skip to content

Direct Arguments for Idealism in the First Dialogue between Hylas and Philonous

Georges Dicker

Oxford University Press eBooks June 15, 2011 DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195381467.003.0006 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Argues that Berkeley's arguments for the claim that we perceive only our own ideas face significant challenges, particularly the overlooked "argument from the principle of perceptual immediacy," which aims to obviate the dispositional-manifest distinction but is critiqued in depth.

Abstract

This chapter surveys, formulates, and evaluates Berkeley's main arguments for the foundational doctrine of his philosophy, namely that we perceive only our own ideas or, as he puts it, that sensible qualities are only ideas or sensations in the mind: the pleasure-pain argument, two subtly different versions of the argument from perceptual relativity (one of which invokes, in effect, the twentieth-century notion of sense-data), and an argument, overlooked by commentators, that Dicker calls “the argument from the principle of perceptual immediacy,” which is intended, among other things, to obviate the distinction between the dispositional and the manifest aspects of a sensible quality. The chapter offers in-depth critiques of each argument, and gives a detailed analysis of three different concepts of immediate perception used by Berkeley. It draws substantially on contemporary work in the philosophy of perception (e.g. Moore, Chisholm, Smith) and contemporary Berkeley scholarship (e.g. Pappas, Warnock, Winkler, Rickless).