Conceptualizing and Measuring Mindfulness in School Settings: A Mixed Methods Study and Development of Mindfulness in School Scale
Ziyaeddin Halid İpek, Ferudun Sezgin
Journal of Intelligence September 1, 2026 DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence14090210 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Exploratory sequential mixed methods design Qualitative Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 663 |
| Population | Teachers |
| Measures | Mindfulness in School Scale (MSS) |
| Topics | Meditation |
| Key points | The Mindfulness in School Scale (MSS) has a five-dimensional structure (Self-Observation, Environmental Observation, Self-Awareness, Environmental Awareness, Acceptance) explaining 51.46% of variance, with satisfactory fit and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.80–0.93). The authors suggest mindfulness in schools involves intrapersonal and interpersonal processes, with environmental awareness as a contextually salient dimension. |
Abstract
This study aimed to explore how mindfulness is perceived and experienced by teachers and to develop and validate the Mindfulness in School Scale (MSS) for use in school settings. An exploratory sequential mixed methods design was employed. In the qualitative phase, phenomenological interviews were conducted with 23 teachers selected through purposive maximum variation sampling. Content analysis identified six themes: Self-Observation, Environmental Observation, Self-Awareness, Environmental Awareness, Acceptance, and Reactive Control. These findings informed the development of the MSS. In the quantitative phase, the scale was administered to 663 teachers. Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses supported a five-dimensional structure comprising Self-Observation, Environmental Observation, Self-Awareness, Environmental Awareness, and Acceptance, explaining 51.46% of the total variance. Standardized CFA factor loadings ranged from 0.50 to 0.90, and the measurement model demonstrated satisfactory fit (χ2/df = 1.20, RMSEA = 0.028, CFI = 0.984, TLI = 0.981). The five dimensions also demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranging from 0.80 to 0.93. Correlations among the dimensions were generally low to moderate, indicating that the MSS captures related but distinct aspects of mindfulness in school settings rather than a single underlying construct. The findings further suggest that mindfulness in schools is shaped by both intrapersonal and interpersonal processes, with environmental awareness emerging as a contextually salient dimension. Overall, the MSS provides initial evidence for the validity and reliability of its five dimensions as a multidimensional instrument for assessing mindfulness among teachers in school settings while offering a context-specific framework for future research examining the relationship between mindfulness and emotional intelligence.
Comparable studies
Other qualitative studies on meditation, most cited first.
Citations in the library
Cites 34
- The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003
- Using Self-Report Assessment Methods to Explore Facets of Mindfulness Assessment January 27, 2006
- Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples Assessment February 29, 2008
- Assessment of Mindfulness by Self-Report Assessment September 1, 2004
- Attending to the present: mindfulness meditation reveals distinct neural modes of self-reference Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience August 13, 2007
and 29 more in the library