Impact of Psilocybin on Motor Function in Healthy Participants: A Phase 1, Randomised, Triple-Blind, Dose-Finding Study
Chiranth Bhagavan, Olivia Carter, Glenn Nielsen, David J. Berlowitz, Sara Issak, Sabine Braat, Sophie Zaloumis, Zachary Attard, Gina Oliver, Deanne Mayne, James Rucker, Matthew Butler, Orwa Dandash, Alexander Bryson, Richard Kanaan
CNS Drugs August 7, 2026 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-026-01326-4 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Randomized controlled trial Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 13 |
| Population | Healthy adult volunteers |
| Intervention | Psilocybin |
| Dose | 5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg, 20 mg |
| Duration | At least 1 week between doses; movement tasks at 1.5, 3, and 4.5 hours post-dose |
| Measures | de Morton Mobility Index, Functional Movement Exploration, Action Research Arm Test, Box and Block Test (Original and Modified), Digit Symbol Substitution Test, Reaction Time Ruler Drop Test |
| Topics | Psilocybin |
| Key findings | Movement tasks were feasible during psilocybin dosing up to 15 mg, with no serious adverse events. At 20 mg, impairments appeared in tasks combining motor and cognitive functions, while simple motor tasks remained near-perfect. Nausea (62%) and headache (54%) were the most common adverse events. |
Abstract
Background: Psychedelics exert widespread effects on brain activity, but their impact on motor function is unclear. This is clinically relevant given the emerging interest in psychedelic-assisted physical therapy for disorders of motor function. This study examined the feasibility and safety of administering movement tasks following low-to-moderate doses of psilocybin in healthy volunteers.
Methods: Healthy adult participants were randomly assigned three psilocybin doses consisting of either (1) 5 mg, 10 mg and 15 mg or (2) 10 mg, 15 mg and 20 mg, with at least 1 week between doses. Movement tasks were administered at 1.5 h, 3 h and 4.5 h post-dose. Participants, physiotherapists and statisticians were blinded to the dosing order. Feasibility was assessed by evaluating completion of the de Morton Mobility Index and Functional Movement Exploration (assessing gross motor function). Safety outcomes included vital signs and adverse events. Additional exploratory motor outcomes included the Action Research Arm Test (assessing upper limb functional performance), Box and Block Test (Original and Modified versions) (combining dexterity with motor speed), Digit Symbol Substitution Test (combining motor speed with intellectual functions) and Reaction Time Ruler Drop Test (assessing reaction time). Alterations in conscious states and blinding efficacy were also assessed. Outcomes were summarised descriptively and with post hoc linear mixed-effects modelling performed to explore dose- and time-related effects.
Results: A total of 13 participants (62% male) were enrolled, with a median age of 33 years (range 22-39 years), median height of 177 cm (155-188 cm) and median weight of 74 kg (51-94 kg). One participant was unable to complete several movement tasks at 20 mg. Nausea (n = 8, 62%) and headache (n = 7, 54%) were the most common adverse events. No serious adverse events or adverse events related to movement task administration occurred. Median values [interquartile ranges] remained near-perfect for the de Morton Mobility Index (92.5-100.0 [85.0-100.0]), Functional Movement Exploration (100.0 [96.0-100.0]) and Action Research Arm Test (56.0-57.0 [52.0-57.0]). Baseline Box and Block Test (Original) median scores (65.0 [60.0-67.0]) improved to 79.0 [70.0-83.0] at 5 mg and 4.5 h post-dose (5 mg-4.5 h), and worsened to 57.5 [51.0-64.0] at 20 mg-1.5 h. Baseline Box and Block Test (Modified) median scores (48.0 [47.0-53.0]) worsened to 43.0 [35.0-45.0] at 20 mg-1.5 h. Baseline Digit Symbol Substitution Test median scores (73.0 [66.0-77.0]) improved to 87.0 [81.0-90.0] at 10 mg-4.5 h, and worsened to 62.0 [54.0-86.0] at 20 mg-1.5 h. Reaction Time Ruler Drop Test scores lacked consistent dose-related changes. Alterations in conscious states were greatest at 20 mg. Participants and physiotherapists correctly guessed the administered dose 53% and 50% of the time, respectively.
Conclusions: Movement tasks were feasible during psilocybin dosing up to 15 mg. No significant safety concerns related to movement task participation during the acute drug effects were observed. At 20 mg, impairments were observed in movement tasks that combined motor and additional cognitive functions. These findings inform future studies utilising psilocybin-assisted physical rehabilitation in clinical populations.
Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12621000560897. Date registered: 12 May 2021.
Comparable studies
Other randomized controlled trials on psilocybin, most cited first.
| Study | Year | Design | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psilocybin produces substantial and sustained decreases in depression and anxiety in patients with life-threatening cancer: A randomized double-blind trial Cancer patients with life-threatening diagnoses and symptoms of depression and/or anxiety | 2016 | Randomized controlled trial | n = 51 |
| Rapid and sustained symptom reduction following psilocybin treatment for anxiety and depression in patients with life-threatening cancer: a randomized controlled trial Patients with cancer-related anxiety and depression | 2016 | Double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial | n = 29 |
| Psilocybin can occasion mystical-type experiences having substantial and sustained personal meaning and spiritual significance Hallucinogen-naïve adults reporting regular participation in religious or spiritual... | 2006 | Double-blind study | n = 36 |
| Trial of Psilocybin versus Escitalopram for Depression Selected group of patients with depression | 2021 | Randomized controlled trial | |
| Effects of Psilocybin-Assisted Therapy on Major Depressive Disorder Adults aged 21 to 75 years with major depressive disorder, not currently using... | 2020 | Randomized controlled trial | n = 24 |
Citations in the library
Cites 39
- Trial of Psilocybin versus Escitalopram for Depression New England Journal of Medicine April 14, 2021
- Human hallucinogen research: guidelines for safety. Journal of Psychopharmacology July 1, 2008
- REBUS and the Anarchic Brain: Toward a Unified Model of the Brain Action of Psychedelics Pharmacological Reviews June 20, 2019
- Psychedelics Promote Structural and Functional Neural Plasticity Cell Reports June 1, 2018
- Psilocybin occasioned mystical-type experiences: immediate and persisting dose-related effects. Psychopharmacology December 1, 2011
and 34 more in the library