Skip to content

The effects of suppressing intrusive thoughts on dream content, dream distress and psychological parameters

Tana Kröner-Borowik, Stefanie Gosch, Kathrin Hansen, Benjamin Borowik, Michael Schredl, Regina Steil

Journal of Sleep Research May 16, 2013 DOI: 10.1111/jsr.12058 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Randomized controlled trial Peer reviewed
Sample size 30
Population Healthy good sleepers
Intervention Thought suppression
Duration 1 week
Measures Dream diary
Topics Dreaming
Keywords Dream Thought suppression Content measure theory Distressing Sleep quality Depression economics Clinical psychology Psychotherapist Psychoanalysis Cognition
Citations 26
Key findings Thought suppression before sleep increased dreams related to the suppressed thought and showed a tendency toward more distressing dreams, with a significant increase in general psychiatric symptomatology. No significant effects were found for depression, sleep quality, or perceived stress.

Abstract

Suppressing unwanted thoughts can lead to an increased occurrence of the suppressed thought in dreams. This is explainable by the ironic control theory, which theorizes why the suppression of thoughts might make them more persistent. The present study examined the influence of thought suppression on dream rebound, dream distress, general psychiatric symptomatology, depression, sleep quality and perceived stress. Thirty healthy participants (good sleepers) were investigated over a period of 1 week. Half were instructed to suppress an unwanted thought 5 min prior to sleep, whereas the other half were allowed to think of anything at all. Dream content was assessed through a dream diary. Independent raters assessed whether or not the dreams were related to the suppressed target thought. The results demonstrated increased target-related dreams and a tendency to have more distressing dreams in the suppression condition. Moreover, the data imply that thought suppression may lead to significantly increased general psychiatric symptomatology. No significant effects were found for the other secondary outcomes.

Explore topics