Pain modulation by meditation and electroacupuncture in experimental submaximum effort tourniquet technique (SETT).
Kyung-Eun Choi, Thomas Rampp, Felix J Saha, Gustav J Dobos, Frauke Musial
Explore (New York, N.Y.) January 1, 2011 DOI: 10.1016/j.explore.2011.04.004 (opens in new tab) via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractIn a semirandomized feasibility study, experienced Vipassana meditators showed greater baseline pain tolerance than nonmeditators. Electroacupuncture (EA) increased pain tolerance and decreased pain ratings in nonmeditators, matching the level of meditation-induced analgesia, but provided no additional benefit for meditators. The study used an ischemic pain model (submaximum effort tourniquet technique) with 8 meditators (mean 2,626.8 hours of practice) and 40 control subjects. Pain tolerance was measured as the ratio of tolerated time to pain ratings. The findings suggest both EA and meditation can relieve pain, but combining them does not enhance analgesia.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Semirandomized trial Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 48 |
| Population | 8 Vipassana meditators and 40 nonmeditating control subjects |
| Intervention | Electroacupuncture |
| Key finding | Electroacupuncture increased pain tolerance and decreased pain ratings in nonmeditators to the level of meditation-induced analgesia, but provided no additional pain control benefit for meditators. |
Abstract
Although acupuncture and meditation are widely utilized in the clinical treatment of pain, trials to evaluate their efficacy and modes of action under experimental conditions have yielded equivocal results. This feasibility study investigated whether electroacupuncture (EA) and meditation effectively relieve pain within a well-established ischemic pain paradigm (submaximum effort tourniquet technique, SETT). In this semirandomized trial, experienced meditators were compared with nonmeditators. The nonmeditating subjects were randomly assigned to either an EA group or a nontreatment group. The trial was conducted at the Department of Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. Eight Vipassana meditators (mean experience hours = 2,626.8 ± 1,602.3 hours SD) and 40 control subjects were enrolled. SETT (250 mm Hg, time limit = 30 minutes, pain rating limit = 10) was applied twice (baseline vs treatment) on the nondominant arm; EA was applied to the contralateral acupoints LI4 and LI10 (stimulation 20 minutes prior to and throughout the SETT); meditators were asked to meditate throughout the whole experimental procedure. Pain ratings were obtained every three minutes on a numerical rating scale (0-10). The ratio of the tolerated time to the ratings served as the pain tolerance index. At baseline, meditators exhibited significantly greater pain tolerance than the other two groups. During the second or treatment session, pain sensitivity did not change significantly in the nontreatment group, whereas pain tolerance significantly increased and pain ratings decreased to the level of meditation-induced analgesia in the EA group. Electroacupuncture induced no additional pain control benefit for meditators.