Skip to content

The three world problem: How to do philosophy of mind without metaphysics

Catherine M. Reason

PsyArXiv January 22, 2025 preprint DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/qbfrz (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper
Topics Philosophy of mind
Key points Argues that philosophy of mind and metaphysics exert an excessive and ill-founded influence on consciousness research, because metaphysical terms are often ill-defined and equivocal and philosophical arguments are weaker than abstract mathematical formulations. Offers the "Three Worlds Problem" as a mathematical argument that traditional metaphysics cannot adequately address or challenge.

Abstract

This article suggests that the influence of philosophy of mind and metaphysics in the study of consciousness, has become excessive and is not well-founded. Metaphysical terms are often ill-defined and equivocal, and philosophy of mind relies largely on weak, concrete arguments which lack the power of more abstract mathematical formulations. An example is given of a mathematical argument, the Three Worlds Problem, which cannot be adequately addressed or challenged within a traditional metaphysical framework.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on philosophy of mind, most cited first.

Explore topics