Skip to content

The effect of mindfulness-based education given to individuals with substance-use disorder according to self-efficacy theory on self-efficacy perception.

Berna Bayır, Rukuye Aylaz

Applied nursing research : ANR February 1, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2020.151354 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Randomized controlled trial Peer reviewed
Sample size 112
Population Individuals diagnosed with substance abuse at Turgut Ozal Medical Center and Gaziantep 25 Aralık State Hospital
Intervention Mindfulness therapy
Duration January 2018-May 2019
Topics Meditation Addiction
Keywords Self-efficacy Substance-use disorder Theory
Key findings Mindfulness-based education significantly improved self-efficacy scores in individuals with substance-use disorder compared to a control group.

Abstract

The aim of this research is to find the effect of mindfulness-based education given to ındividuals with substance-use disorder according to self-efficacy theory on self-efficacy perception. The research was planned as a test model with pretest-posttest control groups. Individuals who have been diagnosed with substance abuse in the substance abuse clinic of Turgut Ozal Medical Center, and at the Substance Abuse Treatment and Education Centre of Gaziantep 25 Aralık State Hospital formed the core of this study. The research was conducted between January 2018-May 2019. 112 patients, 56 in the treatment and 56 in the control group, participated in the study. Scientific research started after ethical approval. Mindfulness therapy was applied to experimental group patients. For the data collection, the Socio-Demographic Characteristics Questionnaire and Self-Efficacy-Sufficiency scale were used. t-Test for dependent variables to compare the mean scores of experimental and control groups and t-test for independent variables were used. It was seen that the average total Self-Efficacy-Sufficiency score of the patients in the treatment group was 76.50 ± 12.62 before the intervention and increased to 85.50 ± 14.95 after the intervention. There is a significant difference between the average scores. Even when the treatment and control groups are compared, a significant difference was still detected between the groups. There was no significant difference between the groups in two of the Self-Efficacy-Sufficiency steps after the intervention in the experimental group, but there were significant differences between the other two factors and total score averages.

Explore topics