The nature of delayed dream incorporation (‘dream‐lag effect’): Personally significant events persist, but not major daily activities or concerns
Jean-Baptiste Eichenlaub, Elaine Van Rijn, Mairéad Phelan, Larnia Ryder, M. Gareth Gaskell, Penelope A. Lewis, Matthew P. Walker, Mark Blagrove
Journal of Sleep Research April 22, 2018 DOI: 10.1111/jsr.12697 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Observational cohort Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 38 |
| Population | Trained participants |
| Duration | 14-day diary period |
| Keywords | Dream Lag |
| Citations | 17 |
| Key findings | The day-residue and dream-lag effects were found for incorporation of personally significant events into dreams only among low-incorporator participants. |
Abstract
Incorporation of details from waking life events into rapid eye movement (REM) sleep dreams has been found to be highest on the 2 nights after, and then 5-7 nights after, the event. These are termed, respectively, the day-residue and dream-lag effects. This study is the first to categorize types of waking life experiences and compare their incorporation into dreams across multiple successive nights. Thirty-eight participants completed a daily diary each evening and a dream diary each morning for 14 days. In the daily diary, three categories of experiences were reported: major daily activities (MDAs), personally significant events (PSEs) and major concerns (MCs). After the 14-day period each participant identified the correspondence between items in their daily diaries and subsequent dream reports. The day-residue and dream-lag effects were found for the incorporation of PSEs into dreams (effect sizes of .33 and .27, respectively), but only for participants (n = 19) who had a below-median total number of correspondences between daily diary items and dream reports (termed "low-incorporators" as opposed to "high-incorporators"). Neither the day-residue or dream-lag effects were found for MDAs or MCs. This U-shaped timescale of incorporation of events from daily life into dreams has been proposed to reflect REM sleep-dependent memory consolidation, possibly related to emotional memory processing. This study had a larger sample size of dreams than any dream-lag study hitherto with trained participants. Coupled with previous successful replications, there is thus substantial evidence supporting the dream-lag effect and further explorations of its mechanism, including its neural underpinnings, are warranted.
Citations in the library
Cited by 8
- The impact of the end of COVID confinement on pandemic dreams, as assessed by a weekly sleep diary: a longitudinal investigation in Italy. Journal of Sleep Research February 1, 2022
- Temporal dynamics of the influence of pre- or anticipated post-sleep stress on dream content Neuropsychologia October 30, 2025
- The influence of intentions on dream content SLEEP Advances 2024
- Targeted memory reactivation has a sleep stage-specific delayed effect on dream content. Journal of Sleep Research February 1, 2022
- Stuck in a lockdown: Dreams, bad dreams, nightmares, and their relationship to stress, depression and anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One 2021
and 3 more in the library
Cites 8
- Daydreams incorporate recent waking life concerns but do not show delayed ('dream-lag') incorporations. Consciousness and Cognition February 1, 2018
- The dream-lag effect: Selective processing of personally significant events during Rapid Eye Movement sleep, but not during Slow Wave Sleep. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory July 1, 2015
- I know how you felt last night, or do I? Self- and external ratings of emotions in REM sleep dreams. Consciousness and Cognition April 1, 2014
- Dreaming and offline memory consolidation. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports March 1, 2014
- A replication of the 5-7 day dream-lag effect with comparison of dreams to future events as control for baseline matching. Consciousness and Cognition June 1, 2011
and 3 more in the library