Assessing the dream-lag effect for REM and NREM stage 2 dreams.
Mark Blagrove, Nathalie C Fouquet, Josephine A Henley-Einion, Edward F Pace-Schott, Anna C Davies, Jennifer L Neuschaffer, Oliver H Turnbull
PLoS One 2011 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026708 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Observational cohort Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 20 |
| Population | Participants who kept daily diaries and slept in a sleep laboratory |
| Duration | Over a week of diary keeping plus 2 nights in the sleep laboratory |
| Key findings | The dream-lag effect (reappearance of features from events 5–7 days prior) was found for REM but not NREM stage 2 dreams. |
Abstract
This study investigates evidence, from dream reports, for memory consolidation during sleep. It is well-known that events and memories from waking life can be incorporated into dreams. These incorporations can be a literal replication of what occurred in waking life, or, more often, they can be partial or indirect. Two types of temporal relationship have been found to characterize the time of occurrence of a daytime event and the reappearance or incorporation of its features in a dream. These temporal relationships are referred to as the day-residue or immediate incorporation effect, where there is the reappearance of features from events occurring on the immediately preceding day, and the dream-lag effect, where there is the reappearance of features from events occurring 5-7 days prior to the dream. Previous work on the dream-lag effect has used spontaneous home recalled dream reports, which can be from Rapid Eye Movement Sleep (REM) and from non-Rapid Eye Movement Sleep (NREM). This study addresses whether the dream-lag effect occurs only for REM sleep dreams, or for both REM and NREM stage 2 (N2) dreams. 20 participants kept a daily diary for over a week before sleeping in the sleep laboratory for 2 nights. REM and N2 dreams collected in the laboratory were transcribed and each participant rated the level of correspondence between every dream report and every diary record. The dream-lag effect was found for REM but not N2 dreams. Further analysis indicated that this result was not due to N2 dream reports being shorter, in terms of number of words, than the REM dream reports. These results provide evidence for a 7-day sleep-dependent non-linear memory consolidation process that is specific to REM sleep, and accord with proposals for the importance of REM sleep to emotional memory consolidation.
Citations in the library
Cited by 32
- Metaphor and hyperassociativity: the imagination mechanisms behind emotion assimilation in sleep and dreaming Frontiers in Psychology August 18, 2015
- Characteristics of the memory sources of dreams: A new version of the content-matching paradigm to take mundane and remote memories into account PLoS One October 11, 2017
- Incorporation of recent waking-life experiences in dreams correlates with frontal theta activity in REM sleep Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience May 29, 2018
- Spotlight on dream recall: the ages of dreams Nature and Science of Sleep 2018
- The nature of delayed dream incorporation (‘dream‐lag effect’): Personally significant events persist, but not major daily activities or concerns Journal of Sleep Research April 22, 2018
and 27 more in the library
Cites 7
- Laboratory references in dreams: Methodological problem and/or evidence for the continuity hypothesis of dreaming? heiDOK (Heidelberg University) 2008
- A replication of the 5-7 day dream-lag effect with comparison of dreams to future events as control for baseline matching. Consciousness and Cognition June 1, 2011
- Cognitive replay of visuomotor learning at sleep onset: temporal dynamics and relationship to task performance. Sleep 2010
- Are life episodes replayed during dreaming? Trends in Cognitive Sciences August 1, 2003
- Dreaming and episodic memory: a functional dissociation? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2003
and 2 more in the library