Jung and Mawlana: The Inner Path and the Archetypes of the Soul
Journal of The Scientific Mysticism and Literature April 20, 2026 DOI: 10.32955/neujsml2026221247 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Topics | Buddhism Mysticism |
| Keywords | Shadow psychology Soul Archetype Theme computing Unconscious mind Epistemology Psychoanalysis Depth psychology Phenomenology philosophy Consciousness Individuation Transcendence philosophy Self Jungian analytical psychology |
| Key points | Argues that Jungian psychology and Rumi's Sufi mysticism share a common metanarrative of inner evolution, with parallel concepts of the Self and the Beloved, ego dissolution, and spiritual ascent. |
Abstract
This paper offers an in-depth comparative analysis of the concepts of Carl Gustav Jung (1875–1961) and the Masnavi poetry of Jalal al-Din Rumi (1207–73) regarding the theme of the inner path and the soul's archetypes. Despite the apparent dichotomy, Jungian analytical psychology and the Sufi mystical tradition reveal remarkable similarities in their understanding of human consciousness transformation. Central to both approaches are symbolic images reflecting the soul’s movement from fragmentation to wholeness: the archetype of the Self in Jung and the Beloved in Rumi, descent into the unconscious and the state of fanā’ (ego dissolution), integration of Shadow aspects and interaction with the inner guide (Anima/Animus and the image of Khidr), together with the ascent, focusing on individuation and the spiritual ‘dance of love’. This paper demonstrates that each of these experiences carries a similar symbolic charge, be it the ‘descent into darkness’, ‘soul dance’, ‘ego dissolution’, or the attainment of inner unity. Jung emphasises the necessity of encountering and integrating the Shadow through the Anima and Animus; Rumi poetically expresses the same process through Eastern mystical imagery. Personality transformation thus appears as a unified, continuous narrative, both mystical and psychological. This comparative analysis not only deepens intercultural understanding but also contributes to a more integral perspective on the relationship between psychology and spirituality. The conclusion asserts that archetypes, love, ego death, and spiritual ascent constitute a single metanarrative of inner evolution relevant to both East and West.