Subjective experiences during dexmedetomidine- or propofol-induced unresponsiveness and non-rapid eye movement sleep in healthy male subjects.
Katja Valli, Linda Radek, Roosa E Kallionpää, Annalotta Scheinin, Jaakko Långsjö, Kaike Kaisti, Oskari Kantonen, Jarno Korhonen, Tero Vahlberg, Antti Revonsuo, Harry Scheinin
British Journal of Anaesthesia August 1, 2023 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.04.026 (opens in new tab) via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractAnaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness and non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep share similar conscious experiences. In a within-subject study, 39 healthy males received either dexmedetomidine or propofol to induce unresponsiveness, and 37 were later awakened from NREM sleep. Most participants were rousable, with no difference between the two drugs. Lower drug concentrations were linked to being rousable but not to recall of experiences. Of interviews after anaesthesia and sleep, 69.7% and 64.4% included experiences, respectively, with no significant difference in recall. Disconnected dream-like experiences and memory incorporation of the research setting occurred equally often in both states, while awareness was rare. The findings suggest that both states involve disconnected conscious experiences with similar recall frequencies and content.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Within-subject experimental study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 39 |
| Population | Healthy males |
| Interventions | dexmedetomidine propofol |
| Topics | Dreaming |
| Keywords | Anaesthesia Awareness Consciousness Dexmedetomidine |
| Registration | NCT01889004 |
| Key finding | Anaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness and NREM sleep are characterised by disconnected conscious experiences with corresponding recall frequencies and content. |
Abstract
Anaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness and non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep share common neural pathways and neurophysiological features. We hypothesised that these states bear resemblance also at the experiential level. We compared, in a within-subject design, the prevalence and content of experiences in reports obtained after anaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness and NREM sleep. Healthy males (N=39) received dexmedetomidine (n=20) or propofol (n=19) in stepwise doses to induce unresponsiveness. Those rousable were interviewed and left unstimulated, and the procedure was repeated. Finally, the anaesthetic dose was increased 50%, and the participants were interviewed after recovery. The same participants (N=37) were also later interviewed after NREM sleep awakenings. Most subjects were rousable, with no difference between anaesthetic agents (P=0.480). Lower drug plasma concentrations were associated with being rousable for both dexmedetomidine (P=0.007) and propofol (P=0.002) but not with recall of experiences in either drug group (dexmedetomidine: P=0.543; propofol: P=0.460). Of the 76 and 73 interviews performed after anaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness and NREM sleep, 69.7% and 64.4% included experiences, respectively. Recall did not differ between anaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness and NREM sleep (P=0.581), or between dexmedetomidine and propofol in any of the three awakening rounds (P>0.05). Disconnected dream-like experiences (62.3% vs 51.1%; P=0.418) and memory incorporation of the research setting (88.7% vs 78.7%; P=0.204) were equally often present in anaesthesia and sleep interviews, respectively, whereas awareness, signifying connected consciousness, was rarely reported in either state. Anaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness and NREM sleep are characterised by disconnected conscious experiences with corresponding recall frequencies and content. Clinical trial registration. This study was part of a larger study registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01889004).