Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Dreaming and awareness during dexmedetomidine- and propofol-induced unresponsiveness.

L Radek, R E Kallionpää, M Karvonen, A Scheinin, A Maksimow, J Långsjö, K Kaisti, T Vahlberg, A Revonsuo, H Scheinin, K Valli

British Journal of Anaesthesia July 1, 2018 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.03.014 (opens in new tab) via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

During anaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness, most people still have experiences, primarily internally generated dreaming rather than external awareness. In a study where healthy participants received stepwise infusions of dexmedetomidine or propofol, 84% of interviews conducted during periods of unresponsiveness contained reports of experiences (90% for dexmedetomidine, 74% for propofol). Internally generated experiences (dreaming) dominated 86% of reports, while externally generated experiences (awareness) were rare and linked to brief arousals. Participants receiving dexmedetomidine reported dreaming and awareness more often than those receiving propofol and recognized emotional sounds better (42% vs 15%), though none spontaneously mentioned sounds. Anaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness does not necessarily induce unconsciousness or disconnectedness.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Randomized controlled trial Peer reviewed
Sample size 47
Population Healthy participants
Interventions dexmedetomidine propofol
Keywords Awareness Consciousness Dexmedetomidine Interview Propofol
Registration NCT01889004
Key finding Anaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness does not induce unconsciousness or necessarily even disconnectedness; most participants reported experiences, primarily dreaming, during periods of unresponsiveness.

Abstract

Experiences during anaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness have previously been investigated by interviews after recovery. To explore whether experiences occur during drug administration, we interviewed participants during target-controlled infusion (TCI) of dexmedetomidine or propofol and after recovery. Healthy participants received dexmedetomidine (n=23) or propofol (n=24) in stepwise increments until loss of responsiveness (LOR1). During TCI we attempted to arouse them for interview (return of responsiveness, ROR1). After the interview, if unresponsiveness ensued with the same dose (LOR2), the procedure was repeated (ROR2). Finally, the concentration was increased 1.5-fold to achieve presumable loss of consciousness (LOC), infusion terminated, and the participants interviewed upon recovery (ROR3). An emotional sound stimulus was presented during LORs and LOC, and memory for stimuli was assessed with recognition task after recovery. Interview transcripts were content analysed. Of participants receiving dexmedetomidine, 18/23 were arousable from LOR1 and LOR2. Of participants receiving propofol, 10/24 were arousable from LOR1 and two of four were arousable from LOR2. Of 93 interviews performed, 84% included experiences from periods of unresponsiveness (dexmedetomidine 90%, propofol 74%). Internally generated experiences (dreaming) were present in 86% of reports from unresponsive periods, while externally generated experiences (awareness) were rare and linked to brief arousals. No within drug differences in the prevalence or content of experiences during infusion vs after recovery were observed, but participants receiving dexmedetomidine reported dreaming and awareness more often. Participants receiving dexmedetomidine recognised the emotional sounds better than participants receiving propofol (42% vs 15%), but none reported references to sounds spontaneously. Anaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness does not induce unconsciousness or necessarily even disconnectedness. NCT01889004.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment