Dreaming and awareness during dexmedetomidine- and propofol-induced unresponsiveness.
L Radek, R E Kallionpää, M Karvonen, A Scheinin, A Maksimow, J Långsjö, K Kaisti, T Vahlberg, A Revonsuo, H Scheinin, K Valli
British Journal of Anaesthesia July 1, 2018 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.03.014 (opens in new tab) via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractDuring anaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness, most people still have experiences, primarily internally generated dreaming rather than external awareness. In a study where healthy participants received stepwise infusions of dexmedetomidine or propofol, 84% of interviews conducted during periods of unresponsiveness contained reports of experiences (90% for dexmedetomidine, 74% for propofol). Internally generated experiences (dreaming) dominated 86% of reports, while externally generated experiences (awareness) were rare and linked to brief arousals. Participants receiving dexmedetomidine reported dreaming and awareness more often than those receiving propofol and recognized emotional sounds better (42% vs 15%), though none spontaneously mentioned sounds. Anaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness does not necessarily induce unconsciousness or disconnectedness.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Randomized controlled trial Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 47 |
| Population | Healthy participants |
| Interventions | dexmedetomidine propofol |
| Keywords | Awareness Consciousness Dexmedetomidine Interview Propofol |
| Registration | NCT01889004 |
| Key finding | Anaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness does not induce unconsciousness or necessarily even disconnectedness; most participants reported experiences, primarily dreaming, during periods of unresponsiveness. |
Abstract
Experiences during anaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness have previously been investigated by interviews after recovery. To explore whether experiences occur during drug administration, we interviewed participants during target-controlled infusion (TCI) of dexmedetomidine or propofol and after recovery. Healthy participants received dexmedetomidine (n=23) or propofol (n=24) in stepwise increments until loss of responsiveness (LOR1). During TCI we attempted to arouse them for interview (return of responsiveness, ROR1). After the interview, if unresponsiveness ensued with the same dose (LOR2), the procedure was repeated (ROR2). Finally, the concentration was increased 1.5-fold to achieve presumable loss of consciousness (LOC), infusion terminated, and the participants interviewed upon recovery (ROR3). An emotional sound stimulus was presented during LORs and LOC, and memory for stimuli was assessed with recognition task after recovery. Interview transcripts were content analysed. Of participants receiving dexmedetomidine, 18/23 were arousable from LOR1 and LOR2. Of participants receiving propofol, 10/24 were arousable from LOR1 and two of four were arousable from LOR2. Of 93 interviews performed, 84% included experiences from periods of unresponsiveness (dexmedetomidine 90%, propofol 74%). Internally generated experiences (dreaming) were present in 86% of reports from unresponsive periods, while externally generated experiences (awareness) were rare and linked to brief arousals. No within drug differences in the prevalence or content of experiences during infusion vs after recovery were observed, but participants receiving dexmedetomidine reported dreaming and awareness more often. Participants receiving dexmedetomidine recognised the emotional sounds better than participants receiving propofol (42% vs 15%), but none reported references to sounds spontaneously. Anaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness does not induce unconsciousness or necessarily even disconnectedness. NCT01889004.