Experienced meditators exhibit no differences to demographically-matched controls in theta phase synchronisation, P200, or P300 during an auditory oddball task
J.R. Payne, Oliver Baell, Harry Geddes, Bernadette M. Fitzgibbon, Melanie Emonson, AT Hill, Nicholas T. van Dam, Gregory Humble, Paul B. Fitzgerald, Neil W. Bailey
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) April 14, 2019 preprint DOI: 10.1101/608547 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Cross-sectional study |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 44 |
| Population | Community-based mindfulness meditators and healthy controls with no meditation experience |
| Topics | Meditation |
| Keywords | Electroencephalography P200 N100 Dichotic listening Audiology Event-related potential Oddball paradigm Developmental psychology Cognitive psychology Cognition Clinical psychology Visual perception |
| Citations | 6 |
| Key findings | No group differences were observed in behavioral performance or in the global amplitude or distribution of theta phase synchronisation, P200, or P300 between mindfulness meditators and non-meditators. |
Abstract
Abstract Objectives Long-term meditation practice affects the brain’s ability to sustain attention. However, how this occurs is not well understood. Electroencephalography (EEG) studies have found that during dichotic oddball listening tasks, experienced meditators displayed altered attention-related neural markers including theta phase synchronisation (TPS) and event-related potentials (ERP; P200 and P300) to target tones while meditating compared to resting, and compared to non-meditators after intensive meditation interventions. Research is yet to establish whether the changes in the aforementioned neural markers are trait changes which may be observable in meditators irrespective of practice setting.
Method: The present study expanded on previous research by comparing EEG measures from a dichotic oddball task in a sample of community-based mindfulness meditators (n=22) to healthy controls with no meditation experience (n=22). To minimise state effects, neither group practiced meditation during / immediately prior to the EEG session.
Results: No group differences were observed in behavioural performance or either the global amplitude or distribution of theta phase synchronisation, P200 or P300. Bayes Factor analysis suggested evidence against group differences for the P200 and P300.
Conclusions: The results suggest that increased P200, P300 and TPS do not reflect trait-related changes in a community sample of mindfulness meditators. The present study used a larger sample size than previous research and power analayses suggested the study was suficiently powered to detect differences. These results add nuance to our understanding of which processes are affected by meditation and the amount of meditation required to generate differences in specific neural processes.