Skip to content

Experienced Meditators Show Multifaceted Attention-Related Differences in Neural Activity

Neil Wayne Bailey, Oliver Baell, Jake Elijah Payne, Gregory Humble, Harry Geddes, Isabella Cahill, Aron T. Hill, Sung Wook Chung, Melanie Emonson, Oscar W. Murphy, Paul Bernard Fitzgerald

Mindfulness October 5, 2023 DOI: 10.1007/s12671-023-02224-2 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational cross-sectional study Preregistered Peer reviewed
Sample size 61
Population 31 mindfulness meditators and 30 non-meditators from a community sample
Measures attentional-blink (AB) task, electroencephalography (EEG), posterior-N2, P3b, theta and alpha oscillatory phase synchronisation, alpha-power
Citations 21
Key findings No differences were detected in attentional-blink task accuracy or in neural activity within the primary hypotheses. Exploratory analyses showed meditators had greater posterior-N2 and theta phase synchronization indicating prioritized attention to the second target, plus more alpha-phase synchronization and lower alpha-power during second-target processing, but no higher task accuracy.

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Mindfulness meditation (MM) is suggested to improve attention. Research has explored this using the ‘attentional-blink’ (AB) task, where stimuli are rapidly presented, and a second target stimulus (T2) is often missed if presented ∼300ms after an initial target stimulus (T1). This research showed improved task-accuracy and altered neural activity after an intensive 3-month MM retreat. We tested whether these results replicated in a community sample of typical meditators.

Methods: Thirty-one mindfulness meditators and 30 non-meditators completed an AB task while electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded. Between-group comparisons were made for task-accuracy, event-related potential activity (posterior-N2 and P3b), theta and alpha oscillatory phase synchronisation to stimuli presentation, and alpha-power. Primary aims examined effects within time windows reported by previous research. Additional exploratory aims assessed effects across broader time windows.

Results: No differences were detected in task-accuracy or neural activity within our primary hypotheses. However, exploratory analyses showed posterior-N2 and theta phase synchronisation effects indicating meditators prioritised attending to T2 stimuli (p < 0.01). Meditators also showed more alpha-phase synchronisation, and lower alpha-power when processing T2 stimuli (p < 0.025).

Conclusions: Our results showed multiple differences in neural activity that suggested enhanced attention in meditators. The neural activity patterns in meditators aligned with theoretical perspectives on activity associated with enhanced cognitive performance. These include enhanced alpha ‘gating’ mechanisms, increased oscillatory synchronisation to stimuli, and more equal allocation of neural activity across stimuli. However, meditators did not show higher task-accuracy, nor did effects align with our primary hypotheses or previous research. Preregistration This study was not preregistered.

Citations in the library

Cited by 11

and 6 more in the library

Cites 22

and 17 more in the library

Explore topics